Citation network
Chimel Vs. California
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 23, 1969
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 752 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court Chimel v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U.S. 752 (1969) Chimel v. CaliforniaSearch
-
reach, and (2) more extensive searches. Pp. 395 U. S. 765 -766. Page 395 U. S. 753 (d) United Ste v. RabinowitzSearch
-
U. S. 56 , and Harris v. UnitedSearch
-
search incident to a lawful arrest seems first to have been articulated by the Court in 1914 as dictum in Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
Eleven years later, the case of Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
arrest is valid. Without explanation, however, the principle emerged in expanded form a few months later in Agnello v. UnitedSearch
-
was committed, as well as weapons and other things to effect an escape from custody, is not to be doubted. See Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. at 269 U. S. 30 . And in Marron v. UnitedSearch
-
opinion did not mean all that it seemed to say became evident, however, a few years later in Go-Bart Importing Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
States, 282 U. S. 344 , and United States v. LefkowitzSearch
-
Plainly the case before us is essentially different from Marron v. UnitedSearch
-
The limiting views expressed in Go-Bart and Lefkowitz were thrown to the winds, however, in Harris v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 331 U. S. 151 . Only a year after Harris, however, the pendulum swung again. In Trupiano v. UnitedSearch
-
came United States v. RabinowitzSearch
-
plays a crucial part. As the Court put it in McDonald v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 48 , 342 U. S. 51 . Only last Term, in Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Id. at 392 U. S. 29 . But in a companion case, Sibron v. NewSearch
-
mandated by the Fourth Amendment requires no less. This is the principle that underlay our decision in Preston v. UnitedSearch
-
The same basic principle was reflected in our opinion last Term in Sibron. That opinion dealt with Peters v. NewSearch
-
the possibility of such police tactics, the general point so forcefully made by Judge Learned Hand in United States v. KirschenblattSearch
-
Cal.Rptr. at 715-716, n. 1, and the State does not challenge its insufficiency under the principles of Aguilar v. TexasSearch
-
U. S. 108 , and Spinelli v. UnitedSearch
-
McDonald v. UnitedSearch
-
have applied the abstract doctrine of that case to various factual situations with divergent results. Compare Ker v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Abel v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 362 U. S. 217 , and Draper v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 358 U. S. 307 , with Kremen v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 353 U. S. 346 (per curiam). Cf. Chapman v. UnitedSearch
-
Jones v. UnitedSearch
-
Boyd v. UnitedSearch
-
Davis v. UnitedSearch
-
Harris v. UnitedSearch
-
Davis v. MississippiSearch
-
Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
Preston v. UnitedSearch
-
See Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
Brinegar v. UnitedSearch
-
Some courts have carried the Rabinowitz approach to just such lengths. See, e.g., Clifton v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. JacksonSearch
-
search of room upheld). But see James v. LouisianaSearch
-
Cf. Dyke v. TaylorSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Chimel v. CaliforniaSearch
-
United Ste v. RabinowitzSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial