Citation network
Debacker Vs. Brainard
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 12, 1969
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 28 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court DeBacker v. BrainardSearch
-
U.S. 28 (1969) DeBacker v. BrainardSearch
-
court judge at which appellant was adjudged a delinquent was conducted before this Court's decisions in Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
U. S. 145 , and Bloom v. IllinoisSearch
-
U. S. 194 , which were held in DeStefano v. WoodSearch
-
be appropriate in the circumstances Page 396 U. S. 30 of this case, the appeal is dismissed. See Rescue Army v. MunicipalSearch
-
asks this Court to decide whether the Fourteenth and Sixth Amendments, in light of this Court's decisions in Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
by an adult, would, under the Duncan and Bloom cases, require a jury trial if requested. In DeStefano v. WoodsSearch
-
for failure to grant jury trial where trials began prior to May 20, 1968, the date of this Court's decisions in Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
and Bloom v. IllinoisSearch
-
as to this issue, we dismiss such writ as improvidently granted. Mishkin v. NewSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
but because of language in Nebraska case law. See State v. McCoySearch
-
Fugate v. RoninSearch
-
to decide this issue in light of DeStefano v. WoodsSearch
-
That case held that the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial -- made applicable to the States in Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
Johnson v. NewSearch
-
Halliday v. UnitedSearch
-
Desist v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 254 (1969) (concurring in judgment). MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, dissenting. In DeStefano v. WoodsSearch
-
U. S. 631 , 392 U. S. 635 , I stated my view that the decisions in Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
Commonwealth v. FisherSearch
-
of the juvenile proceedings led to some overreaching and arbitrary actions. As Mr. Justice Fortas stated in Kent v. UnitedSearch
-
in juvenile proceedings. Those courts which have granted the right felt that it was implicit in Gault. Nieves v. UnitedSearch
-
Peyton v. NordSearch
-
a fundamental right applicable to the States or that it is not consistent with the concept of a juvenile court. People v. AnonymousSearch
-
Commonwealth v. JohnsonSearch
-
This has been my position with respect to all comparable constitutional decisions. See, e.g., Desist v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court DeBacker v. BrainardSearch
-
Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
DeStefano v. WoodSearch
-
See Rescue Army v. MunicipalSearch
-
In DeStefano v. WoodsSearch
-
Mishkin v. NewSearch
-
See State v. McCoySearch
-
of DeStefano v. WoodsSearch
-
Desist v. UnitedSearch
-
Kent v. UnitedSearch
-
Gault. Nieves v. UnitedSearch
-
People v. AnonymousSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial