Citation network
Minor Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 08, 1969
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Minor v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 396 U.S. 87 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court Minor v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 396 U.S. 87 (1969) Minor v. UnitedSearch
-
the illegality under federal and state law, and the fact that the Fifth Amendment, as held in Leary v. UnitedSearch
-
of an official order form violated petitioner's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. United States v. MinorSearch
-
United States v. BuieSearch
-
and 976, to consider petitioners' Fifth Amendment claims, particularly in light of our intervening decision in Leary v. UnitedSearch
-
relieves unregistered buyers of any duty to pay the transfer tax and secure the incriminating order form. Leary v. UnitedSearch
-
little resemblance to the situation that confronted Leary. The vice of the statute in that case -- as in Marchetti v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 390 U. S. 39 , Grosso v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 390 U. S. 62 , and Haynes v. UnitedSearch
-
Together with No. 271, Buie v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
that he sell only to buyers who first identify themselves, via the order form, as lawful purchasers. Cf. Nigro v. UnitedSearch
-
It would have been no answer in Leary to suggest that the buyer avoid his dilemma by not buying. See Marchetti v. UnitedSearch
-
be raised by the seller as an excuse for evading the clear statutory requirement. See George Campbell Painting Corp. v. ReidSearch
-
Rogers v. UnitedSearch
-
supported by the legislative history and represent what is by now long-established administrative practice. See Leary v. UnitedSearch
-
Narcotics Act and the Marihuana Tax Act was explicitly recognized by Congress when it passed the latter Act. See Leary v. UnitedSearch
-
prevent large classes of people from obtaining order forms -- and hence from acquiring drugs -- at all. United States v. DoremusSearch
-
Webb v. UnitedSearch
-
Nigro v. UnitedSearch
-
taxed, because the revenue obtained is negligible, or because the activity is otherwise illegal. See, e.g., Marchetti v. UnitedSearch
-
See Yee Hem v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 268 U. S. 178 , 268 U. S. 183 (1925). Brolan v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. SullivanSearch
-
Holmes used to say that one dealing with the Government should turn square corners. See Rock Island, A. & L.R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Its constitutionality on this basis was sustained in United States v DoremusSearch
-
by the Act, and it is the order form which provides the crucial link to this proper constitutional purpose. In Nigro v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Minor v. UnitedSearch
-
Leary v. UnitedSearch
-
Marchetti v. UnitedSearch
-
Grosso v. UnitedSearch
-
and Haynes v. UnitedSearch
-
Buie v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Nigro v. UnitedSearch
-
See Marchetti v. UnitedSearch
-
See George Campbell Painting Corp. v. ReidSearch
-
See Leary v. UnitedSearch
-
Act. See Leary v. UnitedSearch
-
Nigro v. UnitedSearch
-
Brolan v. UnitedSearch
-
See Rock Island, A. & L.R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
In Nigro v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. DarbySearch
-
United States v. SullivanSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial