Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Milwaukee Elec. Ry. and Light Co. Vs. Milwaukee

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 31, 1969

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

33 entries 1 linked 32 unlinked
Show
  1. Central Land Co. Vs. Laidley US Supreme Court · Jun 03, 1895
  2. Milwaukee Elec. Ry. & Light Co. v. Milwaukee
    Search
  3. U.S. 100 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court Milwaukee Elec. Ry. & Light Co. v. Milwaukee
    Search
  4. U.S. 100 (1920) Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Company v. Milwaukee
    Search
  5. to be irreconcilable with it on a matter of law, in a suit between strangers. P. 252 U. S. 105 . Gelpcke v. Dubuqe
    Search
  6. Wall. 175, and Muhlker v. New
    Search
  7. is a contract, and what its obligation is, as well as whether the obligation has been impaired. Detroit United Railway v. Detroit
    Search
  8. U. S. 238 , 242 U. S. 249 . But, as stated in Southern Wisconsin Railway v. Madison
    Search
  9. Among the cases relied upon by the state court is State ex rel. Milwaukee v. Milwaukee
    Search
  10. in the first instance, what the public necessity and convenience demanded. Compare Fair Haven & Westville Railroad Co. v. New
    Search
  11. directing an unremunerative extension of facilities or forbidding their abandonment. Mississippi Railroad Commission v. Mobile
    Search
  12. New York & Queen's Gas Co. v. McCall
    Search
  13. assumed or burdens imposed in the ordinary exercise of the police power. Compare Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Kansas
    Search
  14. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway v. Arkansas
    Search
  15. Missouri Pacific Railway v. Omaha
    Search
  16. rests upon the fact that, since entry of the judgment below, the supreme court of the state has decided Superior v. Duluth
    Search
  17. Amendment does not, in guaranteeing equal protection of the laws, assure uniformity of judicial decisions, Backus v. Fort
    Search
  18. U. S. 569 , any more than in guaranteeing due process it assures immunity from judicial error, Central Land Co. v. Laidley
    Search
  19. Tracy v. Ginsberg
    Search
  20. U. S. 170 . Unlike Gelpcke v. Dubuque
    Search
  21. U.S. Supreme Court Milwaukee Elec. Ry. & Light Co. v. Milwaukee
    Search
  22. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Company v. Milwaukee
    Search
  23. Gelpcke v. Dubuqe
    Search
  24. and Muhlker v. New
    Search
  25. Southern Wisconsin Railway v. Madison
    Search
  26. Milwaukee v. Milwaukee
    Search
  27. Compare Fair Haven & Westville Railroad Co. v. New
    Search
  28. Mississippi Railroad Commission v. Mobile
    Search
  29. Compare Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Kansas
    Search
  30. Superior v. Duluth
    Search
  31. Backus v. Fort
    Search
  32. Unlike Gelpcke v. Dubuque
    Search
  33. Detroit United Railway v. Detroit
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales