Citation network
Baldy Vs. Hunter
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 31, 1969
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 388 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court Baldy v. HunterSearch
-
U.S. 388 (1898) Baldy v. HunterSearch
-
States, and which at that time was in the exercise of the ordinary functions of administration, this Court, in Texas v. WhiteSearch
-
In Thorington v. SmithSearch
-
After referring to United States v. RiceSearch
-
Wheat. 253, relating to the occupancy of Castine, Maine, in the war of 1812, by the British forces, and Fleming v. PageSearch
-
In Delmas v. InsuranceSearch
-
This Court has decided, in the case of Thorington v. SmithSearch
-
in Confederate money, and notwithstanding the apparent division of opinion on this question in the case of Hanauer v. WoodruffSearch
-
Wall. 482, we are of opinion that, on the general principle announced in Thorington v. SmithSearch
-
So, in Planters' Bank v. UnionSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
consideration for a promise, expressed or implied, to pay anything, and it was held upon the authority of Thorington v. SmithSearch
-
not therefore without manifest injustice to the parties, be treated as invalid between them. Hence, in Thorington v. SmithSearch
-
Sprott v. UnitedSearch
-
Page 171 U. S. 402 It is said, however, that any such conclusion is inconsistent with the decision in Lamar v. MicouSearch
-
under the authority of the United States as securities in which trust funds might be lawfully invested. Thorington v. SmithSearch
-
Head v. StarkeSearch
-
assent to his unlawful acts to affect his own rights. The case is governed in this particular by the decision in Horn v. LockhartSearch
-
afterwards sold the Alabama bonds and invested the proceeds in Confederate states bonds. It thus appears that Lamar v. MicouSearch
-
is governed by considerations that do not apply to that case. We do not doubt the correctness of the decision in Lamar v. MicouSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Baldy v. HunterSearch
-
Texas v. WhiteSearch
-
and Fleming v. PageSearch
-
of Thorington v. SmithSearch
-
of Hanauer v. WoodruffSearch
-
Thorington v. SmithSearch
-
Planters' Bank v. UnionSearch
-
United States v. RiceSearch
-
Lamar v. MicouSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial