Citation network
Penn-central Merger Cases
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 15, 1968
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
has not been changed. The only change has been in the means of achieving that goal. See generally St. Joe Paper Co. v. AtlanticSearch
-
annually. See Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Its order was approved by a three-judge court in the Southern District of New York. Erie-Lackawanna R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
accord with the statutory standards and are supported by substantial evidence. See, e.g., Illinois C. R. Co. v. NorfolkSearch
-
as the touchstone of economic regulation. Competition is merely one consideration here. See Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
multiplicity of litigation regarding the Commission's merger and inclusion decisions. Cf. Kansas City Southern, R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
No. 778, Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. et al. v. UnitedSearch
-
No. 779, Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
No. 830, Oscar Gruss & Son v. UnitedSearch
-
Bondholders Committee et al. v. UnitedSearch
-
No. 832, Erie-Lackawanna Railroad Co. et al. v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
No. 833, Boston & Maine Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
No. 834, Reading Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
No. 835, City of Scranton et al. v. UnitedSearch
-
States et al., and No. 836, John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. et al. v. UnitedSearch
-
States District Court for the Southern District of New York, argued December 4, 1967. No. 433, City of Pottsville v. UnitedSearch
-
No. 663, Misc., Borough of Moosic v. UnitedSearch
-
States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania et al., and No. 664, Misc., City of Scranton et al. v. UnitedSearch
-
F.Supp. at 329. And appellants' attack upon the District Court's opinion on the basis of SEC v. ChenerySearch
-
We reject N & W's argument that the District Court was guilty of a violation of the rule of SEC v. ChenerySearch
-
Commission had been issued on June 9, 1967, following our remand last Term on March 27, 1967. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Florida v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. CarolinaSearch
-
with one of the parties litigating in the New York action. See, e.g., Lawlor v. NationalSearch
-
Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Co. v. TisdaleSearch
-
New York Central R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
the parties in Pennsylvania, was here for review or was before the New York District Court. See Erie-Lackawanna R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
New York court last Term that challenged the basic validity of the Penn-Central merger. ( See Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
or B & M in the N & W system -- none of which involved the community impact problem. Erie-Lackawanna R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
In Hansberry v. LeeSearch
-
respond affirmatively to an invitation to intervene or else be bound by an adverse decision. Indeed, Chase Nation Bank v. NorwalkSearch
-
Our decisions in Hoffman v. BlaskiSearch
-
U. S. 335 , and Van Dusen v. BarrackSearch
-
Holmes, J., dissenting, in Northern Securities Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
interests before this Court contend that, under either the majority or dissenting opinions in St. Joe Paper Co. v. AtlanticSearch
-
Central system would require at least its submission to a vote of bondholders. See also Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. DenverSearch
-
U. S. 495 . The bondholders also argue that the Commission ignored the admonition of this Court in Palmer v. MassachusettsSearch
-
In re v. LoewesSearch
-
Schwabacher v. UnitedSearch
-
Cleveland, C., C. & St. L.R. Co. v. JacksonSearch
-
Stott v. UnitedSearch
-
St. Joe Paper Co. v. AtlanticSearch
-
See Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
the Southern District of New York. Erie-Lackawanna R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Illinois C. R. Co. v. NorfolkSearch
-
See Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial