Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Avco Corp. Vs. Machinists

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 08, 1968

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

30 entries 2 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. Humphrey Vs. Moore US Supreme Court · Jan 06, 1964
  2. Sinclair Refining Co. Vs. Atkinson US Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1962
  3. U.S. 557 (1968) U.S. Supreme Court Avco Corp. v. Machinists
    Search
  4. U.S. 557 (1968) Avco Corp. v. Aero
    Search
  5. for certiorari (389 U.S. 819) because of an apparent conflict between the decision below and American Dredging Co. v. Local
    Search
  6. which, we held in Textile Workers v. Lincoln
    Search
  7. Local 174 v. Lucas
    Search
  8. Charles Dowd Box Co. v. Courtney
    Search
  9. See England v. Medical
    Search
  10. a) and (b). It is true that the Court, by a 5-to-3 decision in Sinclair Refining Co. v. Atkinson
    Search
  11. cases varies -- from specific performance of the promise to arbitrate ( Textile Workers v. Lincoln
    Search
  12. Mills, supra ), to enforcement or annulment of an arbitration award ( United Steel Workers v. Enterprise
    Search
  13. Wheel & Car Corp., 363 U. S. 593 ), to an award of compensatory damages ( Atkinson v. Sinclair
    Search
  14. Refining Co., 370 U. S. 238 ), and the like. See Smith v. Evening
    Search
  15. Swift Co. v. United
    Search
  16. States, 276 U. S. 311 , 276 U. S. 331 . Cf. Zwickler v. Koota
    Search
  17. U. S. 241 , 389 U. S. 254 -255. When the Court in Sinclair Refining Co. v. Atkinson
    Search
  18. action invokes. Textile Workers v. Lincoln
    Search
  19. Whether it did so because it felt that action was required by Sinclair Refining Co. v. Atkinson
    Search
  20. only by virtue of the latter order that an appeal was possible at this stage of the litigation. American Dredging Co. v. Local
    Search
  21. felt that action was required by Sinclair Refining Co. v. Atkinson
    Search
  22. U.S. Supreme Court Avco Corp. v. Machinists
    Search
  23. Avco Corp. v. Aero
    Search
  24. and American Dredging Co. v. Local
    Search
  25. Textile Workers v. Lincoln
    Search
  26. United Steel Workers v. Enterprise
    Search
  27. Atkinson v. Sinclair
    Search
  28. See Smith v. Evening
    Search
  29. Cf. Zwickler v. Koota
    Search
  30. American Dredging Co. v. Local
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial