Citation network
Cameron Vs. Johnson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 22, 1968
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 611 (1968) U.S. Supreme Court Cameron v. JohnsonSearch
-
U.S. 611 (1968) Cameron v. JohnsonSearch
-
and this Court's remand (381 U.S. 741) for reconsideration in the light of the intervening decision in Dombrowski v. PfisterSearch
-
Douglas v. CitySearch
-
dismissal, 381 U. S. 741 , and remanded for reconsideration in light of our intervening decision in Dombrowski v. PfisterSearch
-
remand to reconsider the case in light of Dombrowski was first to render a declaratory judgment, cf. Zwickler v. KootaSearch
-
Connally v. GeneralSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Edwards v. SouthSearch
-
Zwickler v. KootaSearch
-
valid statute would not, of course, constitute that enforcement an impermissible invasion of protected freedoms. Cox v. LouisianaSearch
-
constitutional statutes which we have found to be unconstitutionally applied to suppress protected freedoms. See Cox v. LouisianaSearch
-
Wright v. GeorgiaSearch
-
on a criminal trial, it was demonstrated that the State had no expectation of securing valid convictions. Dombrowski v. PfisterSearch
-
to the federal courts. Following our opinion in City of Greenwood v. PeacockSearch
-
U. S. 808 , the cases were remanded to the state courts. Hartfield v. MississippiSearch
-
See Ashton v. KentuckySearch
-
See Cameron v. JohnsonSearch
-
See NAACP v. AlabamaSearch
-
Zwickler v. KootaSearch
-
Keyishian v. BoardSearch
-
Aptheker v. SecretarySearch
-
See Schneider v. StateSearch
-
Giboney v. EmpireSearch
-
MR. JUSTICE FORTAS, with whom MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS joins, dissenting. In my opinion, Dombrowski v. PfisterSearch
-
the assertion of constitutionally protected rights. 380 U.S. at 380 U. S. 490 . See also City of Greenwood v. PeacockSearch
-
could not be used to support a conviction under the language of this specific, narrowly phrased statute. See Thompson v. LouisvilleSearch
-
Brown v. LouisianaSearch
-
constitutes a bar to Dombrowski relief in this case. See, however, City of Greenwood v. PeacockSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Cameron v. JohnsonSearch
-
See Cox v. LouisianaSearch
-
Hartfield v. MississippiSearch
-
See Thompson v. LouisvilleSearch
-
Cox v. LouisianaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial