Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Permian BasIn Area Rate Cases

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 01, 1968

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

57 entries 4 linked 53 unlinked
Show
  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. Vs. Wisconsin US Supreme Court · Jun 07, 1954
  2. Munn Vs. Illinois US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1876
    Relied / Followed
  3. Bowles Vs. Willingham US Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1944
    Relied / Followed
  4. United States Vs. Corrick US Supreme Court · May 18, 1936
  5. OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Following this Court's decision in Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin
    Search
  6. approved the two-price system and the exemption for small producers, but concluded that the requirements of FPC v. Hope
    Search
  7. FPC v. Hope
    Search
  8. as long as the consequences are not arbitrary or unreasonable. FPC v. Natural
    Search
  9. FPC v. Sierra
    Search
  10. Nonetheless, the court concluded that the Commission failed to satisfy the requirements devised by this Court in FPC v. Hope
    Search
  11. FPC v. Natural
    Search
  12. rather than by proceedings conducted on an individual producer basis. This question was left unanswered in Wisconsin v. FPC
    Search
  13. S. 113 , 94 U. S. 133 . Its exercise has regularly been approved by this Court. See, e.g., 280 U. S. v. United
    Search
  14. to measure with appropriate precision the financial and other requirements of the pertinent parties. See Tagg Bros. v. United
    Search
  15. Acker v. United
    Search
  16. United States v. Abilene
    Search
  17. New York v. United
    Search
  18. at 321 U. S. 518 , or because the value of regulated property is reduced as a consequence of regulation. FPC v. Hope
    Search
  19. provide only one of the variables in the constitutional calculus of reasonableness. Covington & Lexington Turnpike Co. v. Sandford
    Search
  20. Stone v. Farmers'
    Search
  21. Covington & Lexington Turnpike Co. v. Sandford
    Search
  22. Nebbia v. New
    Search
  23. with the applicable constitutional standards, FPC v. Natural
    Search
  24. are constitutionally permissible. FPC v. Hope
    Search
  25. administrative order without an appropriate showing of irreparable injury. See, e.g., Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Assn. v. FPC
    Search
  26. was aware, regulation by group or class was a recognized administrative method even in 1937. Compare Tagg Bros. v. United
    Search
  27. that the failure of a majority of the Court to adopt the reasoning of Mr. Justice Jackson's separate opinion in FPC v. Hope
    Search
  28. FPC v. Natural
    Search
  29. formula or combination of formulae. The producers next rely upon a dictum in the opinion of the Court in Bowles v. Willingham
    Search
  30. inserted in unrelated cases. Whatever the dictum's meaning, we do not regard it as decisive here. Compare Wisconsin v. FPC
    Search
  31. Illinois Gas Co. v. Public
    Search
  32. Piedmont & Northern R. Co. v. Comm'n
    Search
  33. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor
    Search
  34. National Broadcasting Co. v. United
    Search
  35. American Trucking Assns. v. United
    Search
  36. Los Angeles Gas Co. v. Railroad
    Search
  37. Comm'n, 289 U. S. 287 , 289 U. S. 304 . And see San Diego Land & Town Co. v. Jasper
    Search
  38. to the issues before us. Bowles v. Willingham
    Search
  39. United Gas v. Callery
    Search
  40. United Gas Co. v. Mobile
    Search
  41. and 5 are illustrated by United Gas v. Callery
    Search
  42. Order No. 232, 25 F.P.C. 379, 380. Indeed, this Court has already entirely sustained the Commission's 1962 order. FPC v. Texaco
    Search
  43. Although the Natural Gas Act is premised upon a continuing system of private contracting, United Gas Co. v. Mobile
    Search
  44. authority to limit or to proscribe contractual arrangements that contravene the relevant public interests. Compare FPC v. Sierra
    Search
  45. expressed the belief that similar arrangements would ameliorate the Commission's administrative difficulties. See FPC v. Hunt
    Search
  46. of FPC v. Hope
    Search
  47. Wisconsin v. FPC
    Search
  48. U. S. v. United
    Search
  49. See Tagg Bros. v. United
    Search
  50. Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Assn. v. FPC
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial