Citation network
Duncan Vs. Louisiana
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 20, 1968
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 145 (1968) U.S. Supreme Court Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
U.S. 145 (1968) Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
and set the case for oral argument with No. 52, Bloom v. IllinoisSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
to extend due process of law to all persons within their jurisdiction. Louisiana relies especially on Maxwell v. DowSearch
-
U. S. 319 (1937), and Snyder v. MassachusettsSearch
-
well it was performing its job, and did not discuss possible distinctions between civil and criminal cases. In Malloy v. HoganSearch
-
Singer v. UnitedSearch
-
possible penalties up to six months do not require a jury trial if they otherwise qualify as petty offenses, Cheff v. SchnackenbergSearch
-
and may in itself, if severe enough, subject the trial to the mandates of the Sixth Amendment. District of Columbia v. PageSearch
-
of other punishment is enough, in itself, to require a jury trial, we are counseled by District of Columbia v. ClawansSearch
-
Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. ChicoSearch
-
Fiske v. KansasSearch
-
See Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
Klopfer v. NorthSearch
-
Washington v. TexasSearch
-
Quoting from Hebert v. LouisianaSearch
-
a State, if a civilized system could be imagined that would not accord the particular protection. For example, Palko v. ConnecticutSearch
-
can justify the conclusions that state courts must exclude evidence seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment, Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
that state prosecutors may not comment on a defendant's failure to testify, Griffin v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U. S. 609 (1965), and that criminal punishment may not be imposed for the status of narcotics addiction, Robinson v. CaliforniaSearch
-
different from the way it appeared in the older cases opining that States might abolish jury trial. See, e.g., Maxwell v. DowSearch
-
Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, adopted specifically to place limitations upon the States. Cf. Fiske v. KansasSearch
-
Gitlow v. NewSearch
-
Irvin v. DowdSearch
-
People v. GarbuttSearch
-
See Patton v. UnitedSearch
-
of this Court interpreting the Sixth Amendment as guaranteeing a 12-man jury in serious criminal cases, Thompson v. UtahSearch
-
as requiring a unanimous verdict before guilt can be found, Maxwell v. DowSearch
-
in the first instance without a jury, but, at the first appellate stage, by de novo trial with a jury, Callan v. WilsonSearch
-
Schick v. UnitedSearch
-
Callan v. WilsonSearch
-
but no jury trial. The denial of jury trial was upheld by a 4-3 vote against state constitutional attack in State v. MaierSearch
-
provides a jury within New York City only for offenses bearing a maximum sentence greater than one year. See People v. SarlabriaSearch
-
It is argued that Cheff v. SchnackenbergSearch
-
this holding I agree for reasons given by the Court. I also agree because of reasons given in my dissent in Adamson v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U. S. 68 . In that dissent, at 332 U. S. 90 , I took the position, contrary to the holding in Twining v. NewSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
Bloom v. IllinoisSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial