Citation network
Bruton Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 20, 1968
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Bruton v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 391 U.S. 123 (1968) U.S. Supreme Court Bruton v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 391 U.S. 123 (1968) Bruton v. UnitedSearch
-
against him, but affirmed petitioner's conviction in view of the trial judge's instructions, relying on Delli Paoli v. UnitedSearch
-
petitioner's right of cross-examination secured by the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. Delli Paoli v. UnitedSearch
-
BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court. This case presents the question, last considered in Delli Paoli v. UnitedSearch
-
this Court has effectively repudiated its basic premise. Before discussing this, we pause to observe that, in Pointer v. TexasSearch
-
Id. at 380 U. S. 406 -407. We applied Pointer in Douglas v. AlabamaSearch
-
of a New York rule which submitted to the jury the question of the voluntariness of the confession itself. Jackson v. DennoSearch
-
also cited in the Jackson note, is the statement of Mr. Justice Jackson in his concurring opinion in Krulewitch v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 130 The significance of Jackson for Dell Paoli was suggested by Chief Justice Traynor in People v. ArandSearch
-
Nash v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the answer to this argument was cogently stated by Judge Lehman of the New York Court of Appeals, dissenting in People v. FisherSearch
-
Lutwak v. UnitedSearch
-
Hopt v. UtahSearch
-
will follow the trial judge's instructions to disregard such information. Nevertheless, as was recognized in Jackson v. LennoSearch
-
so vital to the defendant, that the practical and human limitations of the jury system cannot be ignored. Compare Hopt v. UtahSearch
-
Mora v. UnitedSearch
-
Holt v. UnitedSearch
-
inculpating petitioner in determining petitioner's guilt. But that was also true in the analogous situation in Jackson v. DennoSearch
-
right of cross-examination. The effect is the same as if there had been no instruction at all. See Anderson v. UnitedSearch
-
Burgett v. TexasSearch
-
Reversed. MR. JUSTICE BLACK concurs in the result for the reasons stated in the dissent in Delli Paoli v. UnitedSearch
-
The trial began June 20, 1966, one week after the decision in Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
on the question of the admissibility in evidence of the postal inspector's testimony as to Evans' admissions. Johnson v. NewSearch
-
and were therefore inadmissible under Westover v. UnitedSearch
-
inculpating petitioner was clearly inadmissible against him under traditional rules of evidence, see Krulewitch v. UnitedSearch
-
Fiswick v. UnitedSearch
-
intimate no view whatever that such exceptions necessarily raise questions under the Confrontation Clause. See Pointer v. TexasSearch
-
Mattox v. UnitedSearch
-
instruction as inevitably sufficient to avoid the setting aside of convictions. See, e.g., United States ex rel. Floyd v. WilkinsSearch
-
United States v. BozzaSearch
-
Greenwell v. UnitedSearch
-
Jones v. UnitedSearch
-
Barton v. UnitedSearch
-
Hill v. DeeganSearch
-
F.2d at 215. State decisions which have rejected Delli Paoli include People v. ArandaSearch
-
State v. YoungSearch
-
N.J. 152, 215 A.2d 352. See also People v. BarbaroSearch
-
State v. RosenSearch
-
See Pointer v. TexasSearch
-
Dale v. UnitedSearch
-
a jury consider only relevant and competent evidence bearing on the issue of guilt or innocence. See, e.g., Blumenthal v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. GottfriedSearch
-
Delli Paoli v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. GrunewaldSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Bruton v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial