Citation network
Bumper Vs. North Carolina
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 03, 1968
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
Bumper v. NorthSearch
-
Carolina - 391 U.S. 543 (1968) U.S. Supreme Court Bumper v. NorthSearch
-
Carolina, 391 U.S. 543 (1968) Bumper v. NorthSearch
-
reversal of his conviction for denial of his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to an impartial jury. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
admitted into evidence, was plainly damaging against petitioner, its admission was not harmless error. Chapman v. CaliforniaSearch
-
by the State in a search and seizure violative of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. I In Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
because of the denial of his right under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to trial by an impartial jury. Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
to the search, and that it was constitutional error to admit the rifle in evidence against the petitioner. Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
with respect to all three of the charges against him, its admission at the trial was not harmless error. Chapman v. CaliforniaSearch
-
the right to trial on the issue of guilt by a jury representing a fair cross-section of the community. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
the duty to submit to the jury the lesser degrees of the offense of rape which are supported by the evidence. State v. GreenSearch
-
to the North Carolina Supreme Court referring to studies by W. C. Wilson and F. J. Goldberg, see Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
Byars v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Henry v. UnitedSearch
-
Jones v. UnitedSearch
-
Wren v. UnitedSearch
-
Simmons v. BomarSearch
-
Judd v. UnitedSearch
-
Kovach v. UnitedSearch
-
Amos v. UnitedSearch
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
Higgins v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. MarraSearch
-
MacKenzie v. RobbinsSearch
-
Bull v. ArmstrongSearch
-
Melo v. StateSearch
-
Ind. 16, 24, 164 N.E. 93, 96. See also Salata v. UnitedSearch
-
Brown v. StateSearch
-
Mattingly v. CommonwealthSearch
-
Ky. 30, 250 S.W. 105. Cf. Gibson v. UnitedSearch
-
Naples v. MaxwellSearch
-
Atwood v. StateSearch
-
State v. WatsonSearch
-
to other parties to present its claims at the earliest appropriate time, and to create an adequate record. Cf. Ciucci v. IllinoisSearch
-
point, to have been harmless surplusage. MR. JUSTICE BLACK, dissenting. I This case, like Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
was adopted by this Court was to deter unreasonable searches and seizures in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
See Commonwealth v. TuckerSearch
-
of probable cause or for some other reason, the warrant would not have been a proper predicate for the search, Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
would require reversal of the conviction unless it is saved under the harmless error rule of Chapman v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Bumper v. NorthSearch
-
Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. I In Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
State v. GreenSearch
-
Amos v. UnitedSearch
-
Salata v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Gibson v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial