Citation network
Witherspoon Vs. Illinois
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 03, 1968
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 510 (1968) U.S. Supreme Court Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
U.S. 510 (1968) Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
short of that impartiality to which the petitioner was entitled under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. See Glasser v. UnitedSearch
-
Fay v. NewSearch
-
York, 332 U. S. 261 , 332 U. S. 294 . See Tumey v. OhioSearch
-
People v. HobbsSearch
-
People v. CarpenterSearch
-
have interfered with their ability to determine guilt in accordance with the evidence and the law. See, e.g., State v. ThomasSearch
-
People v. NicolausSearch
-
Piccott v. StateSearch
-
Commonwealth v. LadettoSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
State v. WilliamsSearch
-
Smith v. StateSearch
-
State v. JensenSearch
-
State v. LeuchSearch
-
to what he perceived to be his duty to abide by his oath as a juror and to obey the law of the State. See Commonwealth v. WebsterSearch
-
Mass. 295, 298. See also Atkins v. StateSearch
-
Williams v. StateSearch
-
Rhea v. StateSearch
-
Compare Smith v. StateSearch
-
People v. BandhauerSearch
-
favor of it or that he would not consider doing so in the case before him. See also the voir dire in Rhea v. StateSearch
-
Neb. 461, 466-468, 88 N.W. 789, 790. Cf. State v. WilliamsSearch
-
Stratton v. PeopleSearch
-
Colo. 276, 277. Cf. Commonwealth v. HendersonSearch
-
A. 567, 569. Yet such jurors have frequently been deemed unfit to serve in a capital case. See, e.g., Rhea v. StateSearch
-
People v. BernetteSearch
-
Pennsylvania v. AsheSearch
-
respect to penalty should differ from the corresponding evidentiary rules with respect to guilt. See, e.g., Williams v. NewSearch
-
from the traditional assessment of whether the defendant engaged in a proscribed course of conduct. See, e.g., Specht v. PattersonSearch
-
U.S. 605. Cf. Mempa v. RhaySearch
-
Crawford v. BoundsSearch
-
F.2d 297, 303-304 (alternative holding). Cf. Stroud v. UnitedSearch
-
Logan v. UnitedSearch
-
that decided the petitioner's fate, see Linkletter v. WalkerSearch
-
U. S. 639 , and we have concluded that neither the reliance of law enforcement officials, cf. Tehan v. ShottSearch
-
Johnson v. NewSearch
-
U. S. 731 , nor the impact of a retroactive holding on the administration of justice, cf. Stovall v. DennoSearch
-
systematic and intentional exclusion of some qualified groups, to use Mr. Justice Murphy's words in his dissent in Fay v. NewSearch
-
York, 332 U. S. 261 , 332 U. S. 296 . Fay v. NewSearch
-
accused of a cross-section of the community for decision on both his guilt and his punishment. The Court, in Logan v. UnitedSearch
-
of the incorporation of the Jury Clause of the Sixth Amendment into the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth. Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
leaves the degree of punishment to the jury. Logan v. UnitedSearch
-
of one juror on another. Ballard v. UnitedSearch
-
when a defendant has been deprived of his right to a jury representing a cross-section of the community. See Ballard v. UnitedSearch
-
Ware v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial