Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Sibron Vs. New York

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 10, 1968

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

67 entries 4 linked 63 unlinked
Show
  1. Parker Vs. Ellis US Supreme Court · May 16, 1960
  2. Cooper Vs. California US Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1967
  3. Carafas Vs. Lavallee US Supreme Court · May 20, 1968
    Relied / Followed
  4. Marino Vs. Ragen US Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1947
  5. Sibron v. New
    Search
  6. York - 392 U.S. 40 (1968) U.S. Supreme Court Sibron v. New
    Search
  7. York, 392 U.S. 40 (1968) Sibron v. New
    Search
  8. Fiswick v. United
    Search
  9. St. Pierre v. United
    Search
  10. there was no initial limited exploration for arms before the officer thrust his hand into Sibron's pocket. Terry v. Ohio
    Search
  11. MR CHIEF JUSTICE WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court. These are companion cases to No. 67, Terry v. Ohio
    Search
  12. was properly admitted, on the ground that the searches which uncovered it were authorized by the statute. People v. Sibron
    Search
  13. People v. Peters
    Search
  14. authorized violated their rights under the Fourth Amendment, made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth. Mapp v. Ohio
    Search
  15. of the six-month sentence imposed upon him as a result of his conviction, the case has become moot under St. Pierre v. United
    Search
  16. in custody when he applied for the writ, but had been released before this Court could adjudicate his claims. Carafas v. LaVallee
    Search
  17. fully served or the probationary period during which a suspended sentence could be reimposed had terminated. Ginsberg v. New
    Search
  18. Pollard v. United
    Search
  19. United States v. Morgan
    Search
  20. the burden was upon the convict to show the existence of collateral legal consequences. Three years later, in Fiswick v. United
    Search
  21. The next case which dealt with the problem of collateral consequences was United States v. Morgan
    Search
  22. Id. at 346 U. S. 512 -513. Three years later, in Pollard v. United
    Search
  23. individual's record. The question of the validity of a criminal conviction can arise in many contexts, compare Burgett v. Texas
    Search
  24. time before he can secure adjudication of the State's right to impose it on the basis of some past action. Cf. Peyton v. Rowe
    Search
  25. Young v. United
    Search
  26. U.S. at 315 U. S. 259 . See also Marino v. Ragen
    Search
  27. has been the very reason for the development of the abstention doctrine by this Court. See, e.g., Railroad Comm'n v. Pullman
    Search
  28. into a statute which purports to authorize the issuance of search warrants in certain circumstances. See Berger v. New
    Search
  29. of the grounds for the search and its proposed scope, which lies at the heart of the Fourth Amendment. E.g., Aguilar v. Texas
    Search
  30. Giordenello v. United
    Search
  31. States, 357 U. S. 480 (1958). This Court held last Term in Berger v. New
    Search
  32. its own Page 392 U. S. 61 law of search and seizure to meet the needs of local law enforcement, see Ker v. California
    Search
  33. N.Y.2d 238, 245, 219 N.E.2d 595, 599, 273 N.Y.S.2d 217, 222 (1966). We have held today in Terry v. Ohio
    Search
  34. It is axiomatic that an incident search may not precede an arrest and serve as part of its justification. E.g., Henry v. United
    Search
  35. Johnson v. United
    Search
  36. have been justified at the outset if he had reasonable grounds to believe that Sibron was armed and dangerous. Terry v. Ohio
    Search
  37. People v. Rivera
    Search
  38. able to point to particular facts from which he reasonably inferred that the individual was armed and dangerous. Terry v. Ohio
    Search
  39. they are proper factors Page 392 U. S. 67 to be considered in the decision to make an arrest. Brinegar v. United
    Search
  40. Husty v. United
    Search
  41. States, 282 U. S. 694 (1931), see Henry v. United
    Search
  42. serve as part of its justification. It is a question of fact precisely when, in each case, the arrest took place. Rios v. United
    Search
  43. his freedom of movement on the basis of probable cause to believe that he was engaged in criminal activity. See Henry v. United
    Search
  44. Preston v. United
    Search
  45. Together with No. 74, Peters v. New
    Search
  46. Cf. Fay v. Noia
    Search
  47. Thompson v. City
    Search
  48. Compare Ginsberg v. New
    Search
  49. U.S. Supreme Court Sibron v. New
    Search
  50. Terry v. Ohio
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial