Citation network
Terry Vs. Ohio
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 10, 1968
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 1 (1968) U.S. Supreme Court Terry v. OhioSearch
-
U.S. 1 (1968) Terry v. OhioSearch
-
adjudged them guilty, and the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Judicial District, Cuyahoga County, affirmed. State v. TerrySearch
-
violated petitioner's rights under the Fourth Amendment, made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth. Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
Union Pac. R. Co. v. BotsfordSearch
-
Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
Elkins v. UnitedSearch
-
petitioner was entitled to the protection of the Fourth Amendment as he walked down the street in Cleveland. Beck v. OhioSearch
-
Rios v. UnitedSearch
-
Henry v. UnitedSearch
-
Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
of the Fourth Amendment has been recognized as a principal mode of discouraging lawless police conduct. See Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 383 , 232 U. S. 391 -393 (1914). Thus, its major thrust is a deterrent one, see Linkletter v. WalkerSearch
-
Elkins Page 392 U. S. 13 v. UnitedSearch
-
reasonable at its inception may violate the Fourth Amendment by virtue of its intolerable intensity and scope. Kremen v. UnitedSearch
-
Go-Bart Importing Co. v. PageSearch
-
the circumstances which rendered its initiation permissible. Warden v. HaydenSearch
-
Preston v. UnitedSearch
-
Agnello v. UnitedSearch
-
practicable, obtain advance judicial approval of searches and seizures through the warrant procedure, see, e.g., Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
Chapman v. UnitedSearch
-
failure to comply with the warrant requirement can only be excused by exigent circumstances, see, e.g., Warden v. HaydenSearch
-
Preston v. UnitedSearch
-
Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
Cf. Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
more substantial than inarticulate hunches, a result this Court has consistently refused to sanction. See, e.g., Beck v. OhioSearch
-
in part by the acknowledged necessity to protect the arresting officer from assault with a concealed weapon, Preston v. UnitedSearch
-
however, must, like any other search, be strictly circumscribed by the exigencies which justify its initiation. Warden v. HaydenSearch
-
aspect of the analysis of the reasonableness of particular types of conduct under the Fourth Amendment. See Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
man, in the circumstances, would be warranted in the belief that his safety or that of others was in danger. Cf. Beck v. OhioSearch
-
Brinegar v. UnitedSearch
-
specific reasonable inferences which he is entitled to draw from the facts in light of his experience. Cf. Brinegar v. UnitedSearch
-
Page 392 U. S. 29 scope of governmental action as by imposing preconditions upon its initiation. Compare Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. PollerSearch
-
Linkletter v. WalkerSearch
-
of a seizure and search which were not reasonably related in scope to the justification for their initiation. Warden v. HaydenSearch
-
These limitations will have to be developed in the concrete factual circumstances of individual cases. See Sibron v. NewSearch
-
arrest, is not justified by any need to prevent the disappearance or destruction of evidence of crime. See Preston v. UnitedSearch
-
in the judgment and the opinion except where the opinion quotes from and relies upon this Court's opinion in Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
States and the concurring opinion in Warden v. HaydenSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Terry v. OhioSearch
-
State v. TerrySearch
-
the Fourteenth. Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
Cleveland. Beck v. OhioSearch
-
See Weeks v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial