Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

King Vs. Smith

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 17, 1968

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

35 entries 1 linked 34 unlinked
Show
  1. Monroe Vs. Pape US Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1961
  2. U.S. 309 (1968) U.S. Supreme Court King v. Smith
    Search
  3. U.S. 309 (1968) King v. Smith
    Search
  4. See Alabama Public Service Comm'n v. Southern
    Search
  5. R. Co., 341 U. S. 341 , 341 U. S. 343 , n. 3 (1951). See also Florida Lime Growers v. Jacobsen
    Search
  6. Allen v. Grand
    Search
  7. constitutional challenge is sufficiently substantial, as here, to require the convening of a three-judge court. Damico v. California
    Search
  8. U. S. 416 (1967). See also McNeese v. Board
    Search
  9. Smith v. King
    Search
  10. Supp.). Law v. State
    Search
  11. irrespective of whether the alleged parent is, in fact, the child's real father. Law v. State
    Search
  12. See Chandler v. Whatley
    Search
  13. Englehardt v. Yung's
    Search
  14. Nicholas v. State
    Search
  15. inconsistent with such federal terms and conditions is, to that extent, invalid. See Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. McCracken
    Search
  16. Oklahoma v. Civil
    Search
  17. rather than constitutional, grounds, unless problems of statutory construction are insurmountable. E.g., Harmon v. Brucker
    Search
  18. has been a consistent one, is entitled Page 392 U. S. 335 to great weight. E.g., Power Reactor Co. v. Electricians
    Search
  19. that the making of such a disqualification was an invidious discrimination. Levy v. Louisiana
    Search
  20. affirm this judgment for the reasons more fully elaborated in the opinion of the three-judge District Court. Smith v. King
    Search
  21. See discussion by the District Court in this case, Smith v. King
    Search
  22. compare Glona v. American
    Search
  23. a form of bill of attainder, which I have discussed recently in a different context. George Campbell Painting Corp. v. Reid
    Search
  24. U.S. Supreme Court King v. Smith
    Search
  25. Florida Lime Growers v. Jacobsen
    Search
  26. Damico v. California
    Search
  27. McNeese v. Board
    Search
  28. Law v. State
    Search
  29. See Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. McCracken
    Search
  30. E.g., Harmon v. Brucker
    Search
  31. E.g., Power Reactor Co. v. Electricians
    Search
  32. Levy v. Louisiana
    Search
  33. District Court. Smith v. King
    Search
  34. Glona v. American
    Search
  35. George Campbell Painting Corp. v. Reid
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial