Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Smith Vs. Yeager

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Nov 12, 1968

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

33 entries 2 linked 31 unlinked
Show
  1. Townsend Vs. Sain US Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1963
  2. Fay Vs. Noia US Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1963
  3. U.S. 122 (1968) U.S. Supreme Court Smith v. Yeager
    Search
  4. U.S. 122 (1968) Smith v. Yeager
    Search
  5. the court held, inter alia, that the confession was not coerced, and denied the petition. Thereafter, Townsend v. Sain
    Search
  6. s failure to demand an evidentiary hearing in 1961, followed by such a demand after this Court decided Townsend v. Sain
    Search
  7. evidentiary Page 393 U. S. 123 hearing in a federal habeas corpus proceeding taking place prior to Townsend v. Sain
    Search
  8. murder in a New Jersey court, and sentenced to death. The Supreme Court of New Jersey affirmed the conviction, State v. Smith
    Search
  9. N.J. 433, 142 A.2d 890, and subsequently affirmed the denial of a motion for a new trial. State v. Smith
    Search
  10. before the District Court on June 5, 1961, petitioner's counsel, referring to the then recent decision in Rogers v. Richmond
    Search
  11. that petitioner's confession, introduced at his trial, was not the product of coercion. United States ex rel. Smith v. New
    Search
  12. Page 393 U. S. 125 Salinger v. Loisel
    Search
  13. Sanders v. United
    Search
  14. b) (1964 ed., Supp. III). At the time of the 1961 proceeding, Brown v. Allen
    Search
  15. existed in the state procedure. 344 U.S. at 344 U. S. 506 (opinion of Mr. Justice Frankfurter). Townsend v. Sain
    Search
  16. that the opinions in Brown v. Allen
    Search
  17. which must be considered to supersede, to the extent of any inconsistencies, the opinions in Brown v. Allen
    Search
  18. U.S. at 372 U. S. 312 . Townsend v. Sain
    Search
  19. and made mandatory much of what had previously been within the broad discretion of the District Court. See also Fay v. Noia
    Search
  20. now examine the state of his mind, or presume that he intentionally relinquished a known right or privilege, Johnson v. Zerbst
    Search
  21. s failure to demand an evidentiary hearing in 1961, followed by such a demand after the decision in Townsend v. Sain
    Search
  22. For this reason, if no other, the fact that Townsend v. Sain
    Search
  23. As the State pointed out during the 1961 hearing, Rogers v. Richmond
    Search
  24. U.S. Supreme Court Smith v. Yeager
    Search
  25. Thereafter, Townsend v. Sain
    Search
  26. State v. Smith
    Search
  27. Smith v. New
    Search
  28. Sanders v. United
    Search
  29. Brown v. Allen
    Search
  30. of Mr. Justice Frankfurter). Townsend v. Sain
    Search
  31. Johnson v. Zerbst
    Search
  32. Rogers v. Richmond
    Search
  33. Salinger v. Loisel
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial