Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Laub

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 10, 1967

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

31 entries 5 linked 26 unlinked
Show
  1. Kent Vs. Dulles US Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1958
  2. Zemel Vs. Rusk US Supreme Court · May 03, 1965
  3. United States Vs. Wiltberger US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1820
  4. United States Vs. Cardiff US Supreme Court · Dec 08, 1952
  5. United States Vs. Healy US Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1964
  6. U.S. 475 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Laub
    Search
  7. U.S. 475 (1967) United States v. Laub
    Search
  8. Section 215(b) is a criminal statute. It must therefore be narrowly construed. United States v. Wiltberger
    Search
  9. Italics added.) In Zemel v. Rusk
    Search
  10. confront that question. Section 215(b) is a criminal statute. It must therefore be narrowly construed. United States v. Wiltberger
    Search
  11. right of the bearer to the protection and good offices of American diplomatic and consular officers. See Urtetiqui v. D'Arcy
    Search
  12. supra, 357 U.S. at 357 U. S. 125 . See Aptheker v. Secretary
    Search
  13. the Secretary of State to impose area restrictions incidental to his general powers with respect to passports. Zemel v. Rusk
    Search
  14. Act. Zemel v. Rusk
    Search
  15. in good faith reliance upon authoritative assurance that punishment will not attach. As this Court said in Raley v. Ohio
    Search
  16. commands (citing Lanzetta v. New
    Search
  17. citing United States v. Cardiff
    Search
  18. citing Johnson v. United
    Search
  19. United States v. Healy
    Search
  20. rather than the rule, in our history to require that citizens engaged in foreign travel should have a passport. Kent v. Dulles
    Search
  21. Travis v. United
    Search
  22. Worthy v. United
    Search
  23. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Laub
    Search
  24. In Zemel v. Rusk
    Search
  25. See Urtetiqui v. D'Arcy
    Search
  26. See Aptheker v. Secretary
    Search
  27. Act. Zemel v. Rusk
    Search
  28. Raley v. Ohio
    Search
  29. Lanzetta v. New
    Search
  30. Johnson v. United
    Search
  31. Travis v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales