Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Clewis Vs. Texas

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 24, 1967

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

31 entries 6 linked 25 unlinked
Show
  1. Miranda Vs. Arizona US Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1966
  2. Fikes Vs. Alabama US Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1957
  3. Haynes Vs. Washington US Supreme Court · May 27, 1963
  4. Leland Vs. Oregon US Supreme Court · Jun 09, 1952
  5. Reck Vs. Pate US Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1961
  6. Cicenia Vs. Lagay US Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1958
  7. U.S. 707 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court Clewis v. Texas
    Search
  8. U.S. 707 (1967) Clewis v. Texas
    Search
  9. held to have been voluntary, and its use as evidence against petitioner deprived him of due process of law. Cf. Davis v. North
    Search
  10. Our recent observation in Davis v. North
    Search
  11. that he was subjected to physical assaults. The trial of this case was prior to the date of decision of Miranda v. Arizona
    Search
  12. U. S. 436 (1966), the requirements of which, therefore, are not directly applicable, Johnson v. New
    Search
  13. Jersey, 384 U. S. 719 (1966), although relevant on the issue of voluntariness, Davis v. North
    Search
  14. in issue, sufficient to insulate the statement from the effect of all that went before. Compare United States v. Bayer
    Search
  15. U. S. 532 , 331 U. S. 540 (1947), with Reck v. Pate
    Search
  16. that he was entitled to remain silent, and that anything he said could be used as evidence against him. Cf. Davis v. North
    Search
  17. Petitioner also claimed that his right to counsel had been violated in the securing of these confessions. Cf. Massiah v. United
    Search
  18. U. S. 191 , 352 U. S. 197 (1957). See also, e.g., Davis v. North
    Search
  19. See Davis v. North
    Search
  20. him indefinitely at the jail. The Court of Criminal Appeals was apparently of the view that the rule of Wong Sun v. United
    Search
  21. Criminal Procedure, Art. 39.14, pretrial discovery of petitioner's confessions would have been proper. Cf. also Dennis v. United
    Search
  22. it may be a denial of due process for a defendant to be refused any discovery of his statements to the police. Cicenia v. Lagay
    Search
  23. U.S. Supreme Court Clewis v. Texas
    Search
  24. Cf. Davis v. North
    Search
  25. Davis v. North
    Search
  26. of Miranda v. Arizona
    Search
  27. Johnson v. New
    Search
  28. Compare United States v. Bayer
    Search
  29. Cf. Massiah v. United
    Search
  30. of Wong Sun v. United
    Search
  31. Dennis v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial