Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Anders Vs. California

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 08, 1967

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

37 entries 2 linked 35 unlinked
Show
  1. Douglas Vs. California US Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1963
    Relied / Followed
  2. Tehan Vs. Shott US Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1966
    Relied / Followed
  3. U.S. 738 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court Anders v. California
    Search
  4. U.S. 738 (1967) Anders v. California
    Search
  5. system for handling indigents' appeals approved by that State's Supreme Court as meeting the requirements of Douglas v. California
    Search
  6. s requirements for the right to counsel are made obligatory upon the States by the Fourteenth Amendment. Gideon v. Wainwright
    Search
  7. filed a reply brief. On January 9, 1959, the District Court of Appeal unanimously affirmed the conviction, People v. Anders
    Search
  8. the judge and the prosecutor had commented on his failure to testify, contrary to the holding of this Court in Griffin v. California
    Search
  9. this Court concerning discrimination against the indigent defendant on his first appeal. Beginning with Griffin v. Illinois
    Search
  10. at 351 U. S. 19 , and continuing through Douglas v. California
    Search
  11. long been required whenever a defendant challenges a certification that an appeal is not taken in good faith, Johnson v. United
    Search
  12. States, 352 U. S. 565 (1957), and such representation must be in the role of an advocate, Ellis v. United
    Search
  13. At 356 U. S. 675 . In Gideon v. Wainwright
    Search
  14. Eskridge v. Washington
    Search
  15. we reversed, finding that such a procedure did not meet constitutional standards. Lane v. Brown
    Search
  16. the prosecutor had commented to the jury regarding petitioner's failure to testify. In 1965, this Court, in Griffin v. California
    Search
  17. certiorari, ante, p. 264, vacated the judgment below, and remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California
    Search
  18. In re Nash, 61 Cal.2d 491, 393 P.2d 405 (1964), held that the requirements of Douglas v. California
    Search
  19. For comparative purposes see Tate v. United
    Search
  20. States, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 261, 359 F.2d 245, and Johnson v. United
    Search
  21. at trial. But Anders' conviction was affirmed by the California District Court of Appeal six years before Griffin v. California
    Search
  22. U. S. 609 , was decided. Our later decision in Tehan v. Shott
    Search
  23. issue. Cf. O'Connor v. Ohio
    Search
  24. U.S. Supreme Court Anders v. California
    Search
  25. of Douglas v. California
    Search
  26. the Fourteenth Amendment. Gideon v. Wainwright
    Search
  27. People v. Anders
    Search
  28. Griffin v. California
    Search
  29. Griffin v. Illinois
    Search
  30. Johnson v. United
    Search
  31. Ellis v. United
    Search
  32. In Gideon v. Wainwright
    Search
  33. Lane v. Brown
    Search
  34. of Chapman v. California
    Search
  35. Tate v. United
    Search
  36. and Johnson v. United
    Search
  37. Cf. O'Connor v. Ohio
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial