Citation network
Sailors Vs. Board of Educ. of Kent County
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 22, 1967
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Sailors v. BoardSearch
-
of Educ. of Kent County - 387 U.S. 105 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court Sailors v. BoardSearch
-
of Educ. of Kent County, 387 U.S. 105 (1967) Sailors v. BoardSearch
-
district court, rejecting appellants' contention that the system paralleled the county-unit system invalidated in Gray v. SandersSearch
-
A three-judge court was properly convened, since the challenged statute has general and statewide application. Moody v. FlowersSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the county unit system which we invalidated under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment in Gray v. SandersSearch
-
which we held in that case and in Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
U.S. 966. We conclude that a three-judge court was properly convened, for, unlike the situation in Moody v. FlowersSearch
-
generally to all Michigan county school boards of the type described. We start with what we said in Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
created by the State to assist in the carrying out of state governmental functions. As stated by the Court in Hunter v. CitySearch
-
than by an election. Our cases have, in the main, dealt with elections for United States Senator or Congressman ( Gray v. SandersSearch
-
supra ) or for state legislators. Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
Lucas v. ColoradoSearch
-
Page 387 U. S. 109 364 U. S. 339 , 364 U. S. 345 . Yet as stated in Anderson v. DunnSearch
-
arguendo that, where a State provides for an election of a local official or agency, the requirements of Gray v. SandersSearch
-
and Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
talking about the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, as was Mr. Justice Holmes, dissenting in Lochner v. NewSearch
-
But as we indicated in Gomillion v. LightfootSearch
-
appointive, rather than the elective, process. We reserve that question for other cases such as Board of Supervisors v. BianchiSearch
-
election of a local official or agency -- whether administrative, legislative, or judicial -- the requirements of Gray v. SandersSearch
-
The officers in Gray v. SandersSearch
-
on the States be circumvented by local bodies to whom the State delegates authority. Standard Computing Scale Co. v. FarrellSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Sailors v. BoardSearch
-
Hunter v. CitySearch
-
Anderson v. DunnSearch
-
of Gray v. SandersSearch
-
Lochner v. NewSearch
-
Board of Supervisors v. BianchiSearch
-
Standard Computing Scale Co. v. FarrellSearch
-
WMCA, Inc. v. LomenzoSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial