Citation network
Afroyim Vs. Rusk
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 29, 1967
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 253 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court Afroyim v. RuskSearch
-
U.S. 253 (1967) Afroyim v. RuskSearch
-
e). On the basis of Perez v. BrownellSearch
-
the Constitution to divest a person of his United States citizenship absent his voluntary renunciation thereof. Perez v. BrownellSearch
-
by Congress before the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment, and a mature and well considered dictum in Osborn v. BankSearch
-
American citizenship regardless of his intention not to give it up. This is precisely what this Court held in Perez v. BrownellSearch
-
It is in this setting that six years later, in Osborn v. BankSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
abandonment by the citizen himself. And this was the unequivocal statement of the Court in the case of United States v. WongSearch
-
right to remain a citizen in a free country unless he voluntarily relinquishes that citizenship. Perez v. BrownellSearch
-
See, e.g., Agata, Involuntary Expatriation and Schneider v. RuskSearch
-
See Perez v. BrownellSearch
-
his dissent, 356 U.S. at 356 U. S. 66 , naturalization unlawfully procured can be set aside. See, e.g., Knauer v. UnitedSearch
-
Baumgartner v. UnitedSearch
-
Schneiderman v. UnitedSearch
-
whom MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE STEWART, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE join, dissenting. Almost 10 years ago, in Perez v. BrownellSearch
-
proposed in 1794, 1797, and 1818, and upon an isolated dictum from the opinion of Chief Justice Marshall in Osborn v. BankSearch
-
the Court relies for this period is a brief obiter dictum from the lengthy opinion for the Court in Osborn v. BankSearch
-
Huber v. ReilySearch
-
this point was not expressly reached, his general understanding of the statute was approved by this Court in Kurtz v. MoffittSearch
-
the Court can obtain little support from its invocation of the dictum from the opinion for the Court in United States v. WongSearch
-
the dictum must be read in light of the subsequent opinion for the Court, written by Mr. Justice McKenna, in Mackenzie v. HareSearch
-
Stat. 490. It was this provision that, after various recodifications, was held unconstitutional by this Court in Trop v. DullesSearch
-
any apparent indication that the section was, or had ever been thought to be, beyond Congress' authority. Kurtz v. MoffittSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Afroyim v. RuskSearch
-
of Perez v. BrownellSearch
-
Osborn v. BankSearch
-
of United States v. WongSearch
-
Agata, Involuntary Expatriation and Schneider v. RuskSearch
-
Knauer v. UnitedSearch
-
Schneider v. RuskSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial