Citation network
See Vs. City of Seattle
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 05, 1967
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
See v. CitySearch
-
of Seattle - 387 U.S. 541 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court See v. CitySearch
-
of Seattle, 387 U.S. 541 (1967) See v. CitySearch
-
Fourth Amendment to effect unconsented administrative entry and inspection of private commercial premises. Cf. Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. We noted probable jurisdiction and set this case for argument with Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
citing Davis v. UnitedSearch
-
for the warrantless inspection of commercial premises pursuant to the Seattle Fire Code. In Go-Bart Importing Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Amos v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 255 U. S. 313 , and Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
search, Oklahoma Press Pub. Co. v. WallingSearch
-
In United States v. CardiffSearch
-
As a result, the statute was subsequently amended, see n 3, supra. ) See also Federal Trade Comm'n v. AmericanSearch
-
See United States v. MortonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Oklahoma Press Pub. Co. v. WallingSearch
-
United States v. BauschSearch
-
Davis v. UnitedSearch
-
Eight years ago, my Brother Frankfurter wisely wrote in Frank v. MarylandSearch
-
Today, the Court renders this municipal experience, which dates back to Colonial days, for naught by overruling Frank v. MarylandSearch
-
I I shall not treat in any detail the constitutional issue involved. For me, it was settled in Frank v. MarylandSearch
-
In only one case during all that period have the courts denied municipalities this right. See District of Columbia v. LittleSearch
-
other grounds, 339 U. S. 1 (1950). In addition to the two cases in this Court ( Frank, supra, and Eaton v. PriceSearch
-
than 10 occasions where the ordinance required the householder to so permit. In Seattle, the site of No. 180, See v. CitySearch
-
code violations also often cause many conflagrations. Indeed, if the fire inspection attempted in District of Columbia v. LittleSearch
-
designed to aid in the improvement of these areas. We should remember the admonition of MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS in Berman v. ParkerSearch
-
correct possible defects are going to keep many a door closed to the inspector. It was said by way of dissent in Frank v. MarylandSearch
-
the factors the Court relies upon are the identical ones my Brother Frankfurter gave for excusing warrants in Frank v. MarylandSearch
-
action elaborated today give more support -- both legal and practical -- to the present practice as approved in Frank v. MarylandSearch
-
that was true in District of Columbia v. LittleSearch
-
This opinion applies also to No. 92, Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
DePass v. CitySearch
-
City of St. Louis v. EvansSearch
-
Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
Commonwealth v. HadleySearch
-
City of Seattle v. SeeSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court See v. CitySearch
-
Cf. Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
the Seattle Fire Code. In Go-Bart Importing Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
and Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Federal Trade Comm'n v. AmericanSearch
-
Frank v. MarylandSearch
-
See District of Columbia v. LittleSearch
-
and Eaton v. PriceSearch
-
Berman v. ParkerSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial