Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Walker Vs. City of Birmingham

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 12, 1967

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

66 entries 4 linked 62 unlinked
Show
  1. Kovacs Vs. Cooper US Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1949
  2. Schneider Vs. State US Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1939
  3. Thornhill Vs. Alabama US Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1940
  4. Howat Vs. Kansas US Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1922
  5. Walker v. City
    Search
  6. of Birmingham - 388 U.S. 307 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court Walker v. City
    Search
  7. of Birmingham, 388 U.S. 307 (1967) Walker v. City
    Search
  8. Petitioners could not bypass orderly judicial review of the temporary injunction before disobeying it. Howat v. Kansas
    Search
  9. U. S. 308 have given the licensing authority granted in the ordinance a narrow and precise scope. As in Cox v. New
    Search
  10. Hampshire, 312 U. S. 569 , and Poulos v. New
    Search
  11. its decision are to be respected, and disobedience of them is contempt of its lawful authority, to be punished. Howat v. State
    Search
  12. Ala. 53, 60, 62-63, 181 So.2d 493, 500, 502. Howat v. Kansas
    Search
  13. U.S. at 258 U. S. 189 -190. The rule of state law accepted and approved in Howat v. Kansas
    Search
  14. or modified, or any attempt to secure a parade permit in accordance with its terms. Whatever the limits of Howat v. Kansas
    Search
  15. the strong interest of state and local governments in regulating the use of their streets and other public places. Cox v. New
    Search
  16. Poulos v. New
    Search
  17. Adderley Page 388 U. S. 316 v. Florida
    Search
  18. of public disorder and violence become important objects of legitimate state concern. As the Court stated, in Cox v. Louisiana
    Search
  19. U. S. 379 U.S. 536, 379 U. S. 555 . And as a unanimous Court stated in Cox v. New
    Search
  20. Saia v. New
    Search
  21. Kunz v. New
    Search
  22. in the ordinance Page 388 U. S. 317 a narrow and precise scope, as did the New Hampshire courts in Cox v. New
    Search
  23. Hampshire and Poulos v. New
    Search
  24. Hampshire, both supra. Cf. Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham
    Search
  25. City of Darlington v. Stanley
    Search
  26. abandoned that practice to the detriment of a litigant who finds his claim foreclosed by a novel procedural bar. Barr v. City
    Search
  27. has been sprung upon an unwary litigant when prior practice did not give him fair notice of its existence. Wright v. Georgia
    Search
  28. In Fields v. City
    Search
  29. of Captain G. v. Evans
    Search
  30. violating it, and that their convictions are therefore constitutionally defective under the principle of Thompson v. Louisville
    Search
  31. doctrine that proof of the elements of criminal contempt may be established by circumstantial evidence. Bullock v. United
    Search
  32. States, 265 F.2d 683, cert. denied sub nom. Kasper v. United
    Search
  33. Brougham v. Oceanic
    Search
  34. Trickett v. Kaw
    Search
  35. O'Hearne v. United
    Search
  36. Locke v. United
    Search
  37. McCann v. New
    Search
  38. York Stock Exchange, 80 F.2d 211, cert. denied sub nom. McCann v. Leibell
    Search
  39. McLeod v. Majors
    Search
  40. Kasper v. Brittain
    Search
  41. United States v. Mine
    Search
  42. Shuttlesworth v. City
    Search
  43. Old Dominion Telegraph Co. v. Powers
    Search
  44. Ala. 220, 226, 37 So.195, 197. See Board of Revenue of Covington County v. Merrill
    Search
  45. The same rule of law was followed in Kasper v. Brittain
    Search
  46. whatever its seeming invalidity, citing Howat v. Kansas
    Search
  47. and that the right to picket or parade may not be subjected to the unfettered discretion of local officials. Cox v. Louisiana
    Search
  48. Edwards v. South
    Search
  49. Hague v. C.I
    Search
  50. a case the authority of Page 388 U. S. 332 which has clearly been undermined by subsequent decisions. Howat v. Kansas
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial