Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Nlrb Vs. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 12, 1967

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

39 entries 39 unlinked
Show
  1. NLRB v. Great
    Search
  2. Dane Trailers, Inc. - 388 U.S. 26 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court NLRB v. Great
    Search
  3. Dane Trailers, Inc., 388 U.S. 26 (1967) National Labor Relations Board v. Great
    Search
  4. requires proof that the discriminatory conduct was motivated by an anti-union purpose. American Ship Building Co. v. Labor
    Search
  5. that the Board find a discrimination and a resulting discouragement of union membership. American Ship Building Co. v. Labor
    Search
  6. refusal to pay vacation benefits to strikers was discrimination in its simplest form. Compare Republic Aviation Corp. v. Labor
    Search
  7. Board, 324 U. S. 793 (1945), with Teamsters Union v. Labor
    Search
  8. Labor Board v. Erie
    Search
  9. turns on whether the discriminatory conduct was motivated by an anti-union purpose. American Ship Building Co. v. Labor
    Search
  10. a)(3) violations. American Ship Building Co. v. Labor
    Search
  11. Labor Board v. Brown
    Search
  12. U. S. 278 (1965), and Labor Board v. Erie
    Search
  13. that it may be deemed proscribed without need for proof of an underlying improper motive. Labor Board v. Brown
    Search
  14. American Ship Building Co. v. Labor
    Search
  15. and an affirmative showing of improper motivation must be made. Labor Board v. Brown
    Search
  16. appeared in the record, the Board's conclusions were supported by substantial evidence, Universal Camera Corp. v. Labor
    Search
  17. did not deprive the Board of jurisdiction. NLRB v. C &
    Search
  18. Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor
    Search
  19. Board, 350 U. S. 270 (1956). Cf. Smith v. Evening
    Search
  20. of his right to proceed before the Board where his remedy may be speedier and less expensive than a lawsuit. NLRB v. C &
    Search
  21. dissenting. Because I think that the Court puts forth a premise which misinterprets the recent decision in NLRB v. C &
    Search
  22. a)(3) and (1). Republic Aviation Page 388 U. S. 36 Corp. v. Labor
    Search
  23. U. S. 37 I think the Board and the Court of Appeals were correct in disregarding the contract issue. In NLRB v. C &
    Search
  24. even a legitimate business purpose could be held by the Board not to justify the employer's conduct, Labor Board v. Erie
    Search
  25. independent evidence evincing the employer's anti-union animus would be required to find a violation. Labor Board v. Brown
    Search
  26. of their business justifications. Labor Board v. Mackay
    Search
  27. Radio Officers v. Labor
    Search
  28. a). This position is supported by the legislative history discussed in NLRB v. C &
    Search
  29. U.S. Supreme Court NLRB v. Great
    Search
  30. National Labor Relations Board v. Great
    Search
  31. Compare Republic Aviation Corp. v. Labor
    Search
  32. Teamsters Union v. Labor
    Search
  33. and Labor Board v. Erie
    Search
  34. Universal Camera Corp. v. Labor
    Search
  35. NLRB v. C &
    Search
  36. Cf. Smith v. Evening
    Search
  37. Corp. v. Labor
    Search
  38. In Nlrb V. C &
    Search
  39. Labor Board v. Mackay
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial