Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Whitehill Vs. Elkins

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Nov 06, 1967

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

30 entries 5 linked 25 unlinked
Show
  1. Terminiello Vs. Chicago US Supreme Court · May 16, 1949
  2. Shub Vs. Simpson US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1950
  3. Baggett Vs. Bullitt US Supreme Court · Jun 01, 1964
  4. Naacp Vs. Button US Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1963
  5. Cantwell Vs. Connecticut US Supreme Court · May 20, 1940
  6. U.S. 54 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court Whitehill v. Elkins
    Search
  7. U.S. 54 (1967) Whitehill v. Elkins
    Search
  8. conduct in the sensitive and important area of academic freedom. Pp. 389 U. S. 57 -62. (a) In Gerende v. Election
    Search
  9. Moreover, the First Amendment, which protects a controversial as well as a conventional dialogue ( Terminiello v. Chicago
    Search
  10. to the States as it is to the Federal Government, and it extends to petitions for redress of grievances ( Edwards v. South
    Search
  11. barred only those who seek to overthrow or destroy the Government by force or violence. Reference is made to Gerende v. Election
    Search
  12. The Court of Appeals of Maryland had indicated in Shub v. Simpson
    Search
  13. U.S. at 341 U. S. 56 -57. As we said in Baggett v. Bullitt
    Search
  14. U. S. 59 and broad as to make men of common intelligence speculate at their peril on its meaning. Baggett v. Bullitt
    Search
  15. Keyishian v. Board
    Search
  16. this type of law places on teachers is Page 389 U. S. 60 hostile to academic freedom. As we said in Sweezy v. New
    Search
  17. This, however, is speculation, not certainty. Another Maryland case bearing on the question is Character Committee v. Madras
    Search
  18. oppressive or capricious application as regimes change. That very threat, as we said in another context ( NAACP v. Button
    Search
  19. legislation ( Cantwell v. Connecticut
    Search
  20. of the employee. See Anti-Fascist Committee v. McGrath
    Search
  21. to the requirements of Gerende v. Election
    Search
  22. U.S. Supreme Court Whitehill v. Elkins
    Search
  23. In Gerende v. Election
    Search
  24. Edwards v. South
    Search
  25. Gerende v. Election
    Search
  26. Sweezy v. New
    Search
  27. Character Committee v. Madras
    Search
  28. See Anti-Fascist Committee v. McGrath
    Search
  29. of Gerende v. Election
    Search
  30. Elfbrandt v. Russell
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial