Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Whitney Vs. Florida

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Nov 13, 1967

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

27 entries 4 linked 23 unlinked
Show
  1. GriffIn Vs. Illinois US Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1956
  2. Price Vs. Johnston US Supreme Court · May 24, 1948
  3. Swenson Vs. Bosler US Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1967
  4. Sheppard Vs. Maxwell US Supreme Court · Jun 06, 1966
  5. U.S. 138 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court Whitney v. Florida
    Search
  6. U.S. 138 (1967) Whitney v. Florida
    Search
  7. an evidentiary hearing. Because of the increasing tide of habeas corpus petitions brought by prisoners ( see Price v. Johnston
    Search
  8. does not compel the States to provide any remedy for collateral attack of criminal convictions. Cf. Townsend v. Sain
    Search
  9. S. 738, 386 U. S. 744 . It may not discriminate arbitrarily between persons applying for relief ( e.g., Burns v. Ohio
    Search
  10. U. S. 252 ), and it must adhere to the requirements of due process. Swenson v. Bosler
    Search
  11. to appellate review, we have held them applicable with equal force to state post-conviction proceedings. Smith v. Bennett
    Search
  12. and because venue was res judicata under the judgment in a prior collateral attack by petitioner ( see Whitney v. Cochran
    Search
  13. this characterization and disposition of petitioner's allegations avoid the basic issue presented. Under Entsminger v. Iowa
    Search
  14. as to deprive the state trial of the Page 389 U. S. 140 constitutional requirement of due process. Sheppard v. Maxwell
    Search
  15. to say whether or not counsel's failure to obtain a change of venue was harmless error under the ruling of Chapman v. California
    Search
  16. of the wrong allegedly done to petitioner. Nor are res judicata principles applicable, for, as I read Whitney v. Cochran
    Search
  17. Whitney v. State
    Search
  18. U. S. 142 change of venue, and had not even undertaken to exercise all of his peremptory challenges. Cf. Beck v. Washington
    Search
  19. U.S. Supreme Court Whitney v. Florida
    Search
  20. Cf. Townsend v. Sain
    Search
  21. Burns v. Ohio
    Search
  22. Whitney v. Cochran
    Search
  23. Under Entsminger v. Iowa
    Search
  24. of Chapman v. California
    Search
  25. Cf. Beck v. Washington
    Search
  26. Anders v. California
    Search
  27. Smith v. Bennett
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial