Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Mempa Vs. Rhay

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Nov 13, 1967

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

36 entries 2 linked 34 unlinked
Show
  1. Gideon Vs. Wainwright US Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1963
  2. Townsend Vs. Burke US Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1948
  3. U.S. 128 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court Mempa v. Rhay
    Search
  4. U.S. 128 (1967) Mempa v. Rhay
    Search
  5. to ensure that the conviction and sentence are not based on misinformation or a misreading of court records. Townsend v. Burke
    Search
  6. Supreme Court denied the petition on June 23, 1966, by a vote of six Page 389 U. S. 132 to three. Mempa v. Rhay
    Search
  7. revocation and sentencing proceeding. The petition was denied on the authority of the prior decision in Mempa v. Rhay
    Search
  8. U.S. 907 (1967), and the cases were consolidated for argument. In 1948, this Court held, in Townsend v. Burke
    Search
  9. Id. at 334 U. S. 741 . Then, in Moore v. Michigan
    Search
  10. Id. at 355 U. S. 160 In Hamilton v. Alabama
    Search
  11. at that time, because, under Alabama law, certain defenses had to be raised then or be abandoned. See also Reece v. Georgia
    Search
  12. U. S. 85 (1955), and White v. Maryland
    Search
  13. All the foregoing cases, with the exception of White, were decided during the reign of Betts v. Brady
    Search
  14. to make the right to counsel applicable. In Gideon v. Wainwright
    Search
  15. stage of a criminal proceeding where substantial rights of a criminal accused may be affected. In particular, Townsend v. Burke
    Search
  16. of guilty followed by probation can only be taken after sentence is imposed following revocation of probation. State v. Farmer
    Search
  17. is not so slight as to be capable of being characterized as de minimis. See, e.g., United States ex rel. Elksnis v. Gilligan
    Search
  18. F.Supp. 244 (D.C.S.D.N.Y.1966). Cf. Machibroda v. United
    Search
  19. State v. Farmer
    Search
  20. supra, if the trial judge, in his discretion, finds that the ends of justice will be served, State v. Shannon
    Search
  21. Together with No. 22, Walkling v. Washington
    Search
  22. E.g., Martin v. United
    Search
  23. McKinney v. United
    Search
  24. Nunley v. United
    Search
  25. State v. Proctor
    Search
  26. U.S. Supreme Court Mempa v. Rhay
    Search
  27. Moore v. Michigan
    Search
  28. In Hamilton v. Alabama
    Search
  29. Reece v. Georgia
    Search
  30. and White v. Maryland
    Search
  31. of Betts v. Brady
    Search
  32. In Gideon v. Wainwright
    Search
  33. Elksnis v. Gilligan
    Search
  34. (D.C.S.D.N.Y.1966). Cf. Machibroda v. United
    Search
  35. State v. Shannon
    Search
  36. Walkling v. Washington
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial