Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Rands

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Nov 13, 1967

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

29 entries 4 linked 25 unlinked
Show
  1. Gilman Vs. Philadelphia US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1865
  2. Scranton Vs. Wheeler US Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1900
  3. United States Vs. Chicago US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1849
  4. South Carolina Vs. Georgia US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1876
  5. U.S. 121 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Rands
    Search
  6. U.S. 121 (1967) United States v. Rands
    Search
  7. navigable waters and the proper exercise of that power is not compensable under the Fifth Amendment. United States v. Twin
    Search
  8. We granted certiorari, 386 U.S. 989, because of a seeming conflict between the decision below and United States v. Twin
    Search
  9. FPC v. Niagara
    Search
  10. from the lawful exercise of a power to which the interests of riparian owners have always been subject. United States v. Chicago
    Search
  11. Gibson v. United
    Search
  12. obligated to pay compensation, the United States may change the course of a navigable stream, South Carolina v. Georgia
    Search
  13. U. S. 4 (1876), or otherwise impair or destroy a riparian owner's access to navigable waters, Gibson v. United
    Search
  14. United States v. Commodore
    Search
  15. United States v. Virginia
    Search
  16. when it takes the riparian lands of a private power company using the stream to generate power. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar
    Search
  17. Ibid. All this was made unmistakably clear in United States v. Twin
    Search
  18. Respondents and the Court of Appeals alike have found Twin City inconsistent with the holding in United States v. River
    Search
  19. do not deny that access to navigable waters may enhance the market value of riparian property. See United States v. Commodore
    Search
  20. would receive a windfall to which he is not entitled. Our attention is also directed to Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United
    Search
  21. Omnia Commercial Co., Inc. v. United
    Search
  22. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Rands
    Search
  23. the Fifth Amendment. United States v. Twin
    Search
  24. and United States v. Twin
    Search
  25. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar
    Search
  26. United States v. Twin
    Search
  27. United States v. River
    Search
  28. See United States v. Commodore
    Search
  29. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales