Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Rockefeller Vs. Wells

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 18, 1967

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

29 entries 5 linked 24 unlinked
Show
  1. Reynolds Vs. Sims US Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1964
  2. Duddleston Vs. Grills US Supreme Court · Jan 09, 1967
  3. Kirkpatrick Vs. Preisler US Supreme Court · Apr 07, 1969
  4. Lucas Vs. Rhodes US Supreme Court · Dec 04, 1967
  5. Wesberry Vs. Sanders US Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1964
  6. U.S. 421 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court Rockefeller v. Wells
    Search
  7. U.S. 421 (1967) Rockefeller v. Wells
    Search
  8. of the United States Constitution, as those requirements are defined in Wesberry v. Sanders
    Search
  9. were disapproved in Swann v. Adams
    Search
  10. Id. at 385 U. S. 445 . And see Reynolds v. Sims
    Search
  11. The impossibility of calculating the proper result in these cases from numerical variations is illustrated by Toombs v. Fortson
    Search
  12. Id. at 70. This Court simply affirmed without opinion. 384 U. S. 210 . See also Moore v. Moore
    Search
  13. supra, at 377 U. S. 578 , Swann v. Adams
    Search
  14. are relevant. Instead, the Court more and more often disposes of reapportionment cases summarily, see, e.g., Toombs v. Fortson
    Search
  15. simply to recite that such circumstances may be relevant, without undertaking any elucidation. See, e.g., Swann v. Adams
    Search
  16. statute does not satisfy constitutional requirement, by uncertainty as to the appropriate next step. See, e.g., Lucas v. Rhodes
    Search
  17. based on the best available population figures. It thought that this expedient was in the pattern set by Swann v. Adams
    Search
  18. are to play, alone or in combination with later, albeit incomplete or unverified, population figures. See Lucas v. Rhodes
    Search
  19. I note, however, that the District Court in Preisler v. Secretary
    Search
  20. Id. at 973. This Court affirmed without opinion. 385 U. S. 450 . See also Bush v. Martin
    Search
  21. for example, reported favorably in 1965 on a bill which was intended to implement the requirements of Wesberry v. Sanders
    Search
  22. U.S. Supreme Court Rockefeller v. Wells
    Search
  23. Toombs v. Fortson
    Search
  24. Moore v. Moore
    Search
  25. See Lucas v. Rhodes
    Search
  26. Preisler v. Secretary
    Search
  27. Bush v. Martin
    Search
  28. of Wesberry v. Sanders
    Search
  29. Swann v. Adams
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial