Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Segal Vs. Rochelle

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 18, 1966

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

27 entries 2 linked 25 unlinked
Show
  1. Goodman Vs. Niblack US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1880
  2. United States Vs. Shannon US Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1952
  3. U.S. 375 (1966) U.S. Supreme Court Segal v. Rochelle
    Search
  4. U.S. 375 (1966) Segal v. Rochelle
    Search
  5. does not always prevent giving effect, between the parties, to a noncomplying transfer, Martln v. National
    Search
  6. contention. As the Court of Appeals here recognized, the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, in Fournier v. Rosenblum
    Search
  7. Fisher v. Cushman
    Search
  8. is not outside its reach because it is novel or contingent or because enjoyment must be postponed. E.g., Horton v. Moore
    Search
  9. Kleinschmidt v. Schroeter
    Search
  10. See United States v. Aetna
    Search
  11. and under the predecessor Act claims against the Government passed without impediment to the trustee. See, e.g., Erwin v. United
    Search
  12. and, on balance, we share this view. In Martin v. National
    Search
  13. Martin, which was both anticipated and followed by a number of other courts, state and federal. See California Bank v. United
    Search
  14. Royal Indem. Co. v. United
    Search
  15. Leonard v. Whaley
    Search
  16. doubt that an assignment of the claims at issue would be enforced in equity in the normal case. Trinity Univ. Ins. Co. v. First
    Search
  17. United Hay Co. v. Ford
    Search
  18. may not sue the Government upon it though he join his assignor as well. Page 382 U. S. 385 United States v. Shannon
    Search
  19. U.S. Supreme Court Segal v. Rochelle
    Search
  20. Martln v. National
    Search
  21. Fournier v. Rosenblum
    Search
  22. E.g., Horton v. Moore
    Search
  23. Erwin v. United
    Search
  24. In Martin v. National
    Search
  25. See California Bank v. United
    Search
  26. Trinity Univ. Ins. Co. v. First
    Search
  27. United Hay Co. v. Ford
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial