Citation network
Brown Vs. Louisiana
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 23, 1966
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 131 (1966) U.S. Supreme Court Brown v. LouisianaSearch
-
U.S. 131 (1966) Brown v. LouisianaSearch
-
situations in which this Court invalidated convictions under the same Louisiana statute or its predecessor, Garner v. LouisianaSearch
-
Taylor v. LouisianaSearch
-
and Cox v. LouisianaSearch
-
The Louisiana breach of the peace statute is unconstitutional for overbreadth, as this Court held in Cox v. LouisianaSearch
-
of that State's breach of the peace statute. In the three preceding cases, the convictions were reversed. Garner v. LouisianaSearch
-
S. 157 , decided in December, 1961, involved sit-ins by Negroes at lunch counters catering only to whites. Taylor v. LouisianaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
why the conviction could not be sustained, the Court, citing Terminiello v. ChicagoSearch
-
U. S. 1 , and Edwards v. SouthSearch
-
U.S. at 379 U. S. 551 . See Edwards v. SouthSearch
-
Under Louisiana law, these convictions were not appealable. See Garner v. LouisianaSearch
-
constitutionally be convicted merely because they did not comply with an order to leave the library. See Shuttlesworth v. BirminghamSearch
-
Wright v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Johnson v. VirginiaSearch
-
Cox v. LouisianaSearch
-
a public facility, open to the public. Negroes could not be denied access, since white persons were welcome. Wright v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Watson v. MemphisSearch
-
See Garner v. LouisianaSearch
-
Reeves' discomfort, however we may sympathize with her, to a crime against the State of Louisiana. Cf. Shuttlesworth v. BirminghamSearch
-
cannot constitutionally be applied to punish petitioners' actions in the circumstances of this case. See Edwards v. SouthSearch
-
facility. Interference with this right, so exercised, by state action is intolerable under our Constitution. Wright v. GeorgiaSearch
-
for pursuing those engaged in lawful, constitutionally protected exercise of their fundamental rights. Cf. Wright v. GeorgiaSearch
-
the constitutionally protected demonstration itself, that their critics might react with disorder or violence. See Cox v. LouisianaSearch
-
Terminiello v. ChicagoSearch
-
U. S. 1 . Compare Feiner v. NewSearch
-
Chaplinsky v. NewSearch
-
Niemotko v. MarylandSearch
-
NAACP v. ButtonSearch
-
Cf. Wright v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Cum.Supp.1962). In Cox v. LouisianaSearch
-
have reasonably thought they were being ejected simply to preserve the segregated character of the library. Cf. Wright v. GeorgiaSearch
-
protected as the conduct of the Negro who refused to leave the white section of a segregated courtroom, Johnson v. VirginiaSearch
-
as my Brother Black observed in Feiner v. NewSearch
-
See Shuttlesworth v. BirminghamSearch
-
Compare Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. WilsonSearch
-
U. S. 495 , and Commercial Pictures Corp. v. RegentsSearch
-
U. S. 587 , with Kingsley Int'l Pictures Corp. v. RegentsSearch
-
In declaring the statute unconstitutional for overbreadth, the Court in Cox relied heavily on Terminiello v. ChicagoSearch
-
Cf. NAACP v. ButtonSearch
-
Such a demonstration, in the circumstances of these two cases, is as much a part of the 'free trade in ideas,' Abrams v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Brown v. LouisianaSearch
-
and Edwards v. SouthSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial