Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Ewell

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 23, 1966

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

46 entries 8 linked 38 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Tateo US Supreme Court · Jun 08, 1964
  2. Beavers Vs. Haubert US Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1905
  3. United States Vs. Ball US Supreme Court · May 25, 1896
  4. Draper Vs. Washington US Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1963
  5. Lane Vs. Brown US Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1963
  6. Douglas Vs. California US Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1963
  7. Burns Vs. Ohio US Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1959
  8. GriffIn Vs. Illinois US Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1956
  9. U.S. 116 (1966) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Ewell
    Search
  10. U.S. 116 (1966) United States v. Ewell
    Search
  11. obtains a reversal of a prior, unsatisfied conviction, he may be retried in the normal course of events. United States v. Ball
    Search
  12. ed.). Lauer v. United
    Search
  13. Pollard v. United
    Search
  14. Smith v. United
    Search
  15. Page 383 U. S. 121 motions were granted in 1964. Moreover, it was the decision in Lauer v. United
    Search
  16. courts will be vigilant to strike down previous convictions that are tainted with reversible error. United States v. Tateo
    Search
  17. face of an acquittal or an unreversed conviction for another offense arising out of the same transaction. See Abbate v. United
    Search
  18. the Government's joining in one indictment more than one count allegedly charging the same crime. Compare Blockburger v. United
    Search
  19. That circuit has since overruled its Lauer decision. Collins v. Markley
    Search
  20. for a new trial, there was no suggestion that his right to a speedy trial was being denied him. See also Bayless v. United
    Search
  21. This situation is to be distinguished from Green v. United
    Search
  22. situation should also be distinguished from that presented in Ciucci v, Illinois, 356 U. S. 571 , and Hoag v. New
    Search
  23. most oppressive. Appellees were indicted initially under only one of the three statutes which this Court held in Gore v. United
    Search
  24. the prosecution seemed imperiled. Government tactics of this kind raise very serious questions for me. Cf. Green v. United
    Search
  25. Abbate v. United
    Search
  26. upon Dennis and from 25 to 100 years upon Ewell. Cumulative sentences are permitted by this Court's holding in Gore v. United
    Search
  27. criticized the Government's attempt to penalize a successful appellant by retrying him on an aggravated basis. Green v. United
    Search
  28. of the lesser offense of murder in the second degree. Cf. MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN's separate opinion in Abbate v. United
    Search
  29. Note, 77 Harv.L.Rev. at 1287. See Fay v. Noia
    Search
  30. Cf. State v. Wolf
    Search
  31. People v. Henderson
    Search
  32. On the authority of Lauer v. United
    Search
  33. then subjected to reprosecution under multiple-count indictments. Subsequently, Lauer was overruled by Collins v. Markley
    Search
  34. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Ewell
    Search
  35. Lauer v. United
    Search
  36. See Abbate v. United
    Search
  37. Compare Blockburger v. United
    Search
  38. Collins v. Markley
    Search
  39. Bayless v. United
    Search
  40. Green v. United
    Search
  41. and Hoag v. New
    Search
  42. Gore v. United
    Search
  43. Cf. Green v. United
    Search
  44. See Fay v. Noia
    Search
  45. of Lauer v. United
    Search
  46. Smith v. Bennett
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial