Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Pate Vs. Robinson

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 07, 1966

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

28 entries 28 unlinked
Show
  1. U.S. 375 (1966) U.S. Supreme Court Pate v. Robinson
    Search
  2. U.S. 375 (1966) Pate v. Robinson
    Search
  3. Pp. 383 U. S. 378 -386. (a) The conviction of a legally incompetent defendant violates due process. Bishop v. United
    Search
  4. as to his sanity at the time of the offense. People v. Robinson
    Search
  5. Ill.2d 162, 174 N.E.2d 820 (1961). We denied certiorari. Robinson v. Pate
    Search
  6. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The Court of Appeals reversed, United States ex rel. Robinson v. Pate
    Search
  7. State concedes that the conviction of an accused person while he is legally incompetent violates due process, Bishop v. United
    Search
  8. his right to have the court determine his capacity to stand trial. See Taylor v. United
    Search
  9. See Thomas v. Cunningham
    Search
  10. People v. Shrake
    Search
  11. ultimate decision as to his sanity, it cannot be relied upon to dispense with a hearing on that very issue. Cf. Bishop v. United
    Search
  12. State gives him a new trial within a reasonable time. This disposition accords with the procedure adopted in Rogers v. Richmond
    Search
  13. have previously emphasized the difficulty of retrospectively determining an accused's competence to stand trial. Dusky v. United
    Search
  14. fact aggravates these difficulties. This need for concurrent determination distinguishes the present case from Jackson v. Denno
    Search
  15. The judges likewise phrased their decisions only in terms of sanity and insanity. See, e.g., People v. Baker
    Search
  16. Dusky v. United
    Search
  17. See James v. Boles
    Search
  18. United States v. Kendrick
    Search
  19. Lyles v. United
    Search
  20. U.S. Supreme Court Pate v. Robinson
    Search
  21. Bishop v. United
    Search
  22. People v. Robinson
    Search
  23. Robinson v. Pate
    Search
  24. See Taylor v. United
    Search
  25. Cf. Bishop v. United
    Search
  26. Jackson v. Denno
    Search
  27. People v. Baker
    Search
  28. Rogers v. Richmond
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial