Citation network
Elfbrandt Vs. Russell
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 18, 1966
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 11 (1966) U.S. Supreme Court Elfbrandt v. RussellSearch
-
U.S. 11 (1966) Elfbrandt v. RussellSearch
-
the oath was vacated by this Court, 378 U. S. 127 , and remanded for reconsideration in light of Baggett v. BullittSearch
-
with the many uncertainties found potentially punishable in Baggett v. BullittSearch
-
by the principle that a State may not compel a citizen to prove that he has not engaged in criminal advocacy. Speiser v. RandallSearch
-
which had sustained the oath (94 Ariz. 1, 381 P.2d 554) and remanded the cause for reconsideration in light of Baggett v. BullittSearch
-
Id. at 147-148, 397 P.2d at 949. We recognized in Scales v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
S. 229 -230). The importance of this limiting construction from a constitutional standpoint was emphasized in Noto v. UnitedSearch
-
would run afoul of the Constitution was set at rest by our decision in Aptheker v. SecretarySearch
-
purports to exclude association by one who does not subscribe to the organization's unlawful ends. Here as in Baggett v. BullittSearch
-
Cramp v. BoardSearch
-
impose, in effect, a conclusive presumption that the member shares the unlawful aims of the organization. See Aptheker v. SecretarySearch
-
of State, supra, at 378 U. S. 511 . The unconstitutionality of this Act follows a fortiori from Speiser v. RandallSearch
-
association protected by the First Amendment, made applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment. Baggett v. BullittSearch
-
of Public Instruction, supra. Cf. NAACP v. AlabamaSearch
-
Gibson v. FloridaSearch
-
U. S. 479 , 364 U. S. 488 . And see Louisiana v. NAACPSearch
-
U. S. 293 , 366 U. S. 296 -297. Page 384 U. S. 19 As we said in NAACP v. ButtonSearch
-
which has no place here. See Schneiderman v. UnitedSearch
-
Schware v. BoardSearch
-
Cf. Rowoldt v. PerfettoSearch
-
having tenure, would be entitled to a hearing before she was discharged from her teaching position. See Elfbrandt v. RussellSearch
-
authorized to inquire into such affiliations and it may discharge those who refuse to affirm or deny them. Gerende v. BoardSearch
-
Garner v. BoardSearch
-
Adler v. BoardSearch
-
Beilan v. BoardSearch
-
Nelson v. CountySearch
-
Wieman v. UpdegraffSearch
-
Slochower v. BoardSearch
-
holding membership in and lending their name and influence to those organizations aiming at violent overthrow. Adler v. BoardSearch
-
there is no sound constitutional reason for denying the State the power to treat such false swearing as perjury. Alire v. UnitedSearch
-
Ogden v. UnitedSearch
-
ed.), United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSearch
-
by any illegal means necessary to achieve this end. Page 384 U. S. 22 Communist Party of the United States v. SubversiveSearch
-
There is nothing in Scales v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 367 U. S. 203 , Noto v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 367 U. S. 290 , or Aptheker v. SecretarySearch
-
and deliberate affiliations with those organizations who conspire to destroy the government by violent means. Speiser v. RandallSearch
-
their vulnerability to the charge of being unconstitutionally vague. 97 Ariz. 140, 397 P.2d 944. See Baggett v. BullittSearch
-
American Communications Ass'n v. DoudsSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Elfbrandt v. RussellSearch
-
of Baggett v. BullittSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial