Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Sheppard Vs. Maxwell

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 06, 1966

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

33 entries 6 linked 27 unlinked
Show
  1. Craig Vs. Harney US Supreme Court · May 19, 1947
  2. Bridges Vs. California US Supreme Court · Dec 08, 1941
  3. Chambers Vs. Florida US Supreme Court · Feb 12, 1940
  4. Pennekamp Vs. Florida US Supreme Court · Jun 03, 1946
  5. Rideau Vs. Louisiana US Supreme Court · Jun 03, 1963
  6. Estes Vs. Texas US Supreme Court · Jun 07, 1965
  7. U.S. 333 (1966) U.S. Supreme Court Sheppard v. Maxwell
    Search
  8. U.S. 333 (1966) Sheppard v. Maxwell
    Search
  9. court. Pp. 384 U. S. 350 -351. (b) Identifiable prejudice to the accused need not be shown if, as in Estes v. Texas
    Search
  10. that the jury's verdict be based on evidence received in open court, not from outside sources. Thus, in Marshall v. United
    Search
  11. At 360 U. S. 312 . Likewise, in Irvin v. Dowd
    Search
  12. The undeviating rule of this Court was expressed by Mr. Justice Holmes over half a century ago in Patterson v. Colorado
    Search
  13. Adams v. United
    Search
  14. U. S. 723 , 373 U. S. 726 (1963). In Turner v. Louisiana
    Search
  15. At 379 U. S. 473 . Only last Term, in Estes v. Texas
    Search
  16. into the role of celebrities by the judge's failure to insulate them from reporters and photographers. See Estes v. Texas
    Search
  17. In these circumstances, we can assume that some of this material reached members of the jury. See Commonwealth v. Crehan
    Search
  18. testimony was available to them in the press. This completely nullified the judge's imposition of the rule. See Estes v. Texas
    Search
  19. can be traced to the prosecution as well as the defense aggravates the judge's failure to take any action. See Stroble v. California
    Search
  20. or like statements concerning the merits of the case. See State v. Van
    Search
  21. that a short continuance would have alleviated any problem with regard to the judicial elections. The court in Delaney v. United
    Search
  22. The Press v. the
    Search
  23. U.S. Supreme Court Sheppard v. Maxwell
    Search
  24. Marshall v. United
    Search
  25. Patterson v. Colorado
    Search
  26. In Turner v. Louisiana
    Search
  27. See Estes v. Texas
    Search
  28. See Commonwealth v. Crehan
    Search
  29. See Stroble v. California
    Search
  30. See State v. Van
    Search
  31. Delaney v. United
    Search
  32. Cox v. Louisiana
    Search
  33. Irvin v. Dowd
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial