Citation network
Nicolas Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 13, 1966
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Nicolas v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 384 U.S. 678 (1966) U.S. Supreme Court Nicolas v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 384 U.S. 678 (1966) Nicolas v. UnitedSearch
-
The United States is not entitled to interest in this case. Pp. 384 U. S. 682 -692. (a) Sexton v. DreyfusSearch
-
U. S. 339 , and New York v. SaperSearch
-
in possession during the pendency of the arrangement proceeding. Pp. 384 U. S. 692 -693. (b) Under Boteler v. IngelsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
interest on claims against a bankrupt estate is suspended as of the date the petition in bankruptcy is filed. Sexton v. DreyfusSearch
-
made applicable to the accumulation of interest on claims for taxes by the decision of this Court in New York v. SaperSearch
-
considerations of administrative convenience. As the Court recognized in Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. GreenSearch
-
obligation to pay additional interest on those prior taxes once a petition in bankruptcy has been filed. United States v. KalishmanSearch
-
New York v. SaperSearch
-
United States v. GeneralSearch
-
Cf. Guarantee Title and Trust Co. v. TitleSearch
-
a completely different issue. The result here is governed squarely by the rationale of our decision in Boteler v. IngelsSearch
-
trustee challenge the referee's allowance of the principal of the taxes as an expense of administration. See Dayton v. StanardSearch
-
Michigan v. MichiganSearch
-
McColgan v. MaierSearch
-
United States v. KalishmanSearch
-
Cf. Thomas v. WesternSearch
-
not here relevant, the accrual of interest may continue during the period of bankruptcy administration. Cf. Bruning v. UnitedSearch
-
The decision of the Court in New York v. SaperSearch
-
U. S. 328 , reflected an assimilation of tax debts to the status of other debts in bankruptcy. At the time Sexton v. DreyfusSearch
-
out and ascertain the amount of taxes owed and to obtain an order from the bankruptcy court for payment. See New York v. SaperSearch
-
As Mr. Justice Holmes stated with regard to interest on a secured debt in Sexton v. DreyfusSearch
-
of the bankrupt are supposed to be wound up. If, as in a well known illustration of Chief Justice Shaw's, Parks v. CitySearch
-
See American Iron & Steel Manufacturing Co. v. SeaboardSearch
-
U.S. at 233 U. S. 266 . See also Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. GreenSearch
-
Engineering & Mfg. Co., 188 F.2d 80 (C.A.8th Cir.), aff'd, 342 U.S. 912. Cf. Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. ThompsonSearch
-
to suspend interest both in corporate reorganization proceedings under Chapter X of the Bankruptcy Act, United States v. EdensSearch
-
benefit of creditors, Matter of Pavone Textile Corp., 302 N.Y. 206, 97 N.E.2d 755, aff'd sub nom. United States v. BloomSearch
-
Cf. Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. ThompsonSearch
-
interest allowed only to date of petition on debts reduced to judgment after bankruptcy). Compare State of Missouri v. EarhartSearch
-
Bruning v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. New York v. RassnerSearch
-
United States v. SampsellSearch
-
Hercules Service Parts Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
of a trustee whose activities do not amount to the conduct of business in any meaningful sense. See United States v. SampsellSearch
-
of the Bankruptcy Act. Guarantee Title and Trust Co. v. TitleSearch
-
F.2d 664 (C.A.2d Cir.). Cf. King v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 379 U. S. 329 . Compare Boteler v. IngelsSearch
-
and this Court has held the section applicable to a federal tax claim even where it is secured by a lien. Simonson v. GranquistSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial