Citation network
Georgia Vs. Rachel
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 20, 1966
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
- Distinguished
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 780 (1966) U.S. Supreme Court Georgia v. RachelSearch
-
U.S. 780 (1966) Georgia v. RachelSearch
-
The Court of Appeals, however, reversed on the basis of the 1964 Act as construed in Hamm v. CitySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Strauder v. WestSearch
-
States Congress of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 241. The second was the decision of this Court in Hamm v. CitySearch
-
was before this Court in a series of decisions beginning with Strauder v. WestSearch
-
Virginia, 100 U. S. 303 , and Virginia v. RivesSearch
-
U. S. 313 , in 1880 and ending with Kentucky v. PowersSearch
-
New York v. GalamisonSearch
-
F.2d 255, 269, 271. See also Gibson v. MississippiSearch
-
Emphasis supplied.) 78 Stat. 244. In Hamm v. CitySearch
-
In a series of cases commencing with Strauder v. WestSearch
-
Virginia, supra, and Virginia v. RivesSearch
-
U.S. at 100 U. S. 312 . In Virginia v. RivesSearch
-
ample basis for such a prediction. The doctrine announced in Strauder and Rives was amplified in Neal v. DelawareSearch
-
U. S. 370 , and Bush v. KentuckySearch
-
The final removal case decided by this Court was Kentucky v. PowersSearch
-
U.S. at 100 U. S. 319 . (Emphasis supplied.) This statement was reaffirmed in Gibson v. MississippiSearch
-
of the State will constitute a denial of the rights conferred by the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as construed in Hamm v. CitySearch
-
that makes it a criminal offense to refuse to obey such an order. The Civil Rights Act of 1964, however, as Hamm v. CitySearch
-
prosecutions is itself the denial of a right explicitly conferred by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as construed in Hamm v. CitySearch
-
Hamm v. CitySearch
-
For a remarkably original and comprehensive discussion of the issues presented in this case and in City of Greenwood v. PeacockSearch
-
Smith v. MississippiSearch
-
Williams v. MississippiSearch
-
U. S. 213 . See also Dubuclet v. LouisianaSearch
-
to 1875, a remand order was regarded as a nonfinal order reviewable by mandamus, but not by appeal. Railroad Co. v. WiswallSearch
-
Stat. 553. Compare Gay v. RuffSearch
-
In addition to this case and City of Greenwood v. PeacockSearch
-
post, p. 384 U. S. 808 , from the Fifth Circuit, see Baines v. CitySearch
-
City of Chester v. AndersonSearch
-
under that Act. It recites facts, however, that invoke application of that Act on appeal. See United States v. SchoonerSearch
-
clause of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 was limited to federal officers and those assisting them. See City of Greenwood v. PeacockSearch
-
and agents potentially involved in enforcement activities under the Civil Rights Act of 1866, see City of Greenwood v. PeacockSearch
-
of the Civil Rights Act of 1866. Cf. Tennessee v. DavisSearch
-
Hodgson v. MillwardSearch
-
of the Habeas Corpus Suspension Act of 1863, 12 Stat. 756), approved in Braun v. SauerweinSearch
-
under the Seventh Amendment post-judgment removal with respect to civil cases tried by a jury. The Justices v. MurraySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial