Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Parker Vs. Gladden

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 12, 1966

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

35 entries 6 linked 29 unlinked
Show
  1. Patterson Vs. Colorado US Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1907
    Relied / Followed
  2. Sheppard Vs. Maxwell US Supreme Court · Jun 06, 1966
    Relied / Followed
  3. Pointer Vs. Texas US Supreme Court · Apr 05, 1965
  4. Estes Vs. Texas US Supreme Court · Jun 07, 1965
  5. Rideau Vs. Louisiana US Supreme Court · Jun 03, 1963
  6. Mcdonald Vs. Pless US Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1915
  7. U.S. 363 (1966) U.S. Supreme Court Parker v. Gladden
    Search
  8. U.S. 363 (1966) Parker v. Gladden
    Search
  9. with the witnesses against him. PER CURIAM. Petitioner, after his conviction for second degree murder, State v. Parker
    Search
  10. As we said in Turner v. Louisiana
    Search
  11. of confrontation and cross-examination are among the fundamental requirements of a constitutionally fair trial. Kirby v. United
    Search
  12. U. S. 532 , 381 U. S. 542 -543 (1965). As we said in Turner v. Louisiana
    Search
  13. any event, petitioner was entitled to be tried by 12, not 9 or even 10, impartial and unprejudiced jurors. See State v. Murray
    Search
  14. of opinion on the merits of the case or the judicial process at the risk of declaration of a new trial. Irvin v. Dowd
    Search
  15. Marshall v. United
    Search
  16. Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, I think a different result follows. Much reliance has been placed upon Turner v. Louisiana
    Search
  17. Here, no procedure adopted by the State is to be faulted, and it seems clear to me that the rule of Stroble v. California
    Search
  18. U. S. 181 , and Irvin v. Dowd
    Search
  19. Stein v. New
    Search
  20. grounds for a new trial. Our courts have always been alert to protect the sanctity of the jury process. McDonald v. Pless
    Search
  21. Castaldi v. United
    Search
  22. the jury upon the mere allegation that a prejudicial remark has reached the ears of one of its members. Remmer v. United
    Search
  23. The trial court purported to follow the State Supreme Court's decision in State v. Kristich
    Search
  24. serve to overthrow the verdict. The Supreme Court made no specific finding on prejudice, but, in distinguishing Turner v. Louisiana
    Search
  25. U.S. Supreme Court Parker v. Gladden
    Search
  26. State v. Parker
    Search
  27. Turner v. Louisiana
    Search
  28. Kirby v. United
    Search
  29. See State v. Murray
    Search
  30. of Stroble v. California
    Search
  31. and Irvin v. Dowd
    Search
  32. Castaldi v. United
    Search
  33. Remmer v. United
    Search
  34. State v. Kristich
    Search
  35. Irvin v. Dowd
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial