Citation network
Hoffa Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 12, 1966
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Hoffa v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 385 U.S. 293 (1966) U.S. Supreme Court Hoffa v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 385 U.S. 293 (1966) Hoffa v. UnitedSearch
-
were made in the presence of counsel or in connection with the legitimate defense of the Taft-Hartley trial. Caldwell v. UnitedSearch
-
Coplon v. UnitedSearch
-
trial was impaired, and only he and King have standing with respect to the other constitutional claims. Cf. Wong Sun v. UnitedSearch
-
Jones v. UnitedSearch
-
in the hotel suite, and that Partin's testimony was therefore inadmissible under the exclusionary rule of Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
A hotel room can clearly be the object of Fourth Amendment protection, as much as a home or an office. United States v. JeffersSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
certainly be violated by guileful, as well as by forcible, intrusions into a constitutionally protected area. Gouled v. UnitedSearch
-
of the Fourth Amendment are surely not limited to tangibles, but can extend as well to oral statements. Silverman v. UnitedSearch
-
will not reveal it. Indeed, the Court unanimously rejected that very contention less than four years ago in Lopez v. UnitedSearch
-
of petitioner's office simply because his apparent willingness to accept a bribe was not real. Compare Wong Sun v. UnitedSearch
-
violate the privacy of the office by seizing something surreptitiously without petitioner's knowledge. Compare Gouled v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 373 U. S. 465 . See also Lewis v. UnitedSearch
-
Fifth Amendment right against compulsory self-incrimination. Some of those differences were aired last Term in Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
has found expression in two cases decided by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Caldwell v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 92 U.S.App. D C. 355, 205 F.2d 879, and Coplon v. UnitedSearch
-
of a hung jury, the conviction would presumptively have been set aside as constitutionally defective. Cf. Black v. UnitedSearch
-
of any such violation. In Wong Sun v. UnitedSearch
-
not have continued to question the petitioner without observance of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Massiah v. UnitedSearch
-
speaking peoples Page 385 U. S. 311 even toward those charged with the most heinous offenses' ( Rochin v. CaliforniaSearch
-
United States v. DennisSearch
-
degree more free from all relevant constitutional restrictions than is any other government agent. See Massiah v. UnitedSearch
-
Together with No. 33, Parks v. UnitedSearch
-
States, No. 34, Campbell v. UnitedSearch
-
States, and No. 35, King v. UnitedSearch
-
of the Fourth Amendment if Partin had been a stranger to the petitioner is a question we do not decide. Cf. Lewis v. UnitedSearch
-
the findings of lower courts when it is alleged that fundamental constitutional rights have been violated. Jacobellis v. OhioSearch
-
Hooven & Allison Co. v. EvattSearch
-
prevailing upon friendship with the victim is no less proscribed than an invasion accomplished by force. See Massiah v. UnitedSearch
-
Gouled v. UnitedSearch
-
the administration of justice in federal courts. II For me, this case and two others decided today ( Lewis v. UnitedSearch
-
States, ante, p. 385 U. S. 206 , and Osborn v. UnitedSearch
-
to the business purpose of his visit. As we said in affirming Lewis' conviction, the principles elaborated in Gouled v. UnitedSearch
-
informer when we sustain the undercover work of the agent responsible for Lewis' conviction. Compare Sherman v. UnitedSearch
-
Lopez v. UnitedSearch
-
that are used to invade privacy and that appear to be increasingly prevalent in our country today. Cf. Silverman v. UnitedSearch
-
Black v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. SchipaniSearch
-
is sufficient to require an exercise of our supervisory powers. As we said in ordering a new trial in Mesarosh v. UnitedSearch
-
McNabb v. UnitedSearch
-
Graver Mfg. Co. v. LindeSearch
-
United States v. YellowSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial