Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Cox Vs. Louisiana

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 18, 1965

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

44 entries 9 linked 35 unlinked
Show
  1. Stromberg Vs. California US Supreme Court · May 18, 1931
  2. Cantwell Vs. Connecticut US Supreme Court · May 20, 1940
  3. Thornhill Vs. Alabama US Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1940
  4. Garner Vs. Louisiana US Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1961
  5. Terminiello Vs. Chicago US Supreme Court · May 16, 1949
  6. Schneider Vs. State US Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1939
  7. Largent Vs. Texas US Supreme Court · Mar 08, 1943
  8. Kovacs Vs. Cooper US Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1949
  9. Niemotko Vs. Maryland US Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1951
  10. U.S. 536 (1965) U.S. Supreme Court Cox v. Louisiana
    Search
  11. U.S. 536 (1965) Cox v. Louisiana
    Search
  12. him of his rights of free speech and free assembly in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Edwards v. South
    Search
  13. Fields v. South
    Search
  14. yet one of the very functions of free speech is to invite dispute. Terminiello v. Chicago
    Search
  15. It is clear to us that, on the facts of this case, which are strikingly similar to those present in Edwards v. South
    Search
  16. Page 379 U. S. 545 Carolina, 372 U. S. 229 , and Fields v. South
    Search
  17. a complete absence of evidence so that his conviction deprived him of liberty without due process of law. Cf. Thompson v. Louisville
    Search
  18. Edwards v. South
    Search
  19. deprive the demonstration of its protected character under the Constitution as free speech and assembly. See Edwards v. South
    Search
  20. a far cry from the situation in Feiner v. New
    Search
  21. See Edwards v. South
    Search
  22. See Chaplinsky v. New
    Search
  23. Watson v. Memphis
    Search
  24. political discussion is a basic tenet of our constitutional democracy. As Chief Justice Hughes stated in Stromberg v. California
    Search
  25. convenience of the people in their use and the concomitant right of the people of free speech and assembly. See Lovell v. Griffin
    Search
  26. Hague v. CIO
    Search
  27. Cox v. New
    Search
  28. Saia v. New
    Search
  29. Kunz v. New
    Search
  30. Poulos v. New
    Search
  31. a public or private building, and allow no one to pass who did not agree to listen to their exhortations. See Lovell v. Griffin
    Search
  32. Giboney v. Empire
    Search
  33. Edwards v. South
    Search
  34. and cases cited in No. 49, post at 379 U. S. 563 . We reaffirm the statement of the Court in Giboney v. Empire
    Search
  35. supra, at 308 U. S. 164 . See Lovell v. Griffin
    Search
  36. a device for the suppression of the communication of ideas and permits the official to act as a censor. See Saia v. New
    Search
  37. U.S. Supreme Court Cox v. Louisiana
    Search
  38. of the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Edwards v. South
    Search
  39. and Fields v. South
    Search
  40. Cf. Thompson v. Louisville
    Search
  41. Feiner v. New
    Search
  42. See Lovell v. Griffin
    Search
  43. See Saia v. New
    Search
  44. See Niemotko v. Maryland
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial