Citation network
Freedman Vs. Maryland
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 01, 1965
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 51 (1965) U.S. Supreme Court Freedman v. MarylandSearch
-
U.S. 51 (1965) Freedman v. MarylandSearch
-
a requirement of prior submission to a censorship board is not necessarily unconstitutional. Times Film Corp. v. CitySearch
-
There is a heavy presumption against the constitutional validity of prior restraints of expression. Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSearch
-
Md. 498, 197 A.2d 232, and we noted probable jurisdiction, 377 U.S. 987. We reverse. I In Times Film Corp. v. CitySearch
-
citing a number of our decisions, the Court quoted the statement from Near v. StateSearch
-
has taken four months, and final vindication of the film on appellate review six months. United Artists Corp. v. MarylandSearch
-
Thornhill v. StateSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Staub v. CitySearch
-
Saia v. NewSearch
-
Hague v. CIOSearch
-
Lovell v. CitySearch
-
Marcus v. SearchSearch
-
First, the burden of proving that the film is unprotected expression must rest on the censor. As we said in Speiser v. RandallSearch
-
only a procedure requiring a judicial determination suffices to impose a valid final restraint. See Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSearch
-
A Quantity of Books v. StateSearch
-
censor's view that the film is unprotected, may have a discouraging effect on the exhibitor. See Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSearch
-
In Kingsley Books, Inc. v. BrownSearch
-
that the Maryland Court of Appeals has reversed the Board's disapproval in every reported case. United Artists Corp. v. MarylandSearch
-
Maryland State Board of Censors v. TimesSearch
-
Fanfare Films, Inc. v. MotionSearch
-
to the same degree and kind of protection under the First Amendment as other forms of expression. Superior Films v. DepartmentSearch
-
Kingsley International Pictures Corp. v. RegentsSearch
-
Times Film Corp. v. CitySearch
-
banned from the theatre. I would not admit the censor even for the limited role accorded him in Kingsley Books, Inc. v. BrownSearch
-
obscenity must be assured. Thus, the Chicago censorship system, upheld by the narrowest of margins in Times Film Corp. v. CitySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Freedman v. MarylandSearch
-
I In Times Film Corp. v. CitySearch
-
Near v. StateSearch
-
United Artists Corp. v. MarylandSearch
-
Staub v. CitySearch
-
See Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSearch
-
Superior Films v. DepartmentSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial