Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Sansone Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 29, 1965

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

33 entries 33 unlinked
Show
  1. Sansone v. United
    Search
  2. States - 380 U.S. 343 (1965) U.S. Supreme Court Sansone v. United
    Search
  3. States, 380 U.S. 343 (1965) Sansone v. United
    Search
  4. the jury find a disputed factual element which is not a requisite for conviction of the lesser included offense. Berra v. United
    Search
  5. was not here entitled to a lesser included offense charge based on that section. This Court held in Achilli v. United
    Search
  6. This provision, as the Court had already held in Berra v. United
    Search
  7. a) did not apply to income taxes was removed. See Berra v. United
    Search
  8. can be no doubt that the lesser included offense doctrine applies to these statutes in an appropriate case. See Spies v. United
    Search
  9. Berra v. United
    Search
  10. States, supra, at 351 U. S. 134 . See Stevenson v. United
    Search
  11. the factual issues to be resolved by the jury are the same as to both the lesser and greater offenses. Berra v. United
    Search
  12. Sparf v. United
    Search
  13. the jury to find a disputed factual element which is not required for conviction of the lesser included offense. Berra v. United
    Search
  14. Spies v. United
    Search
  15. the existence of a tax deficiency, Lawn v. United
    Search
  16. and an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, Spies v. United
    Search
  17. and the omission of the required act -- here, the payment of the tax when due. As recognized by this Court in Spies v. United
    Search
  18. Cf. Spies v. United
    Search
  19. the assessment of a tax as well as the offense of willfully attempting to evade or defeat the payment of a tax. Lawn v. United
    Search
  20. understatement of taxes (assuming, of course, that there was in fact a deficiency) was filed. See United States v. Beacon
    Search
  21. Brass Co., 344 U. S. 43 , 344 U. S. 46 . See also Spies v. United
    Search
  22. but still convict him of the lesser misdemeanor offenses included in the felony charge. See Berra v. United
    Search
  23. States, 351 U. S. 131 , 351 U. S. 135 (dissenting opinion). Cf. Achilli v. United
    Search
  24. so as to determine the punishment to be imposed, a duty Congress has traditionally left to the judge. See Sparf v. United
    Search
  25. U.S. Supreme Court Sansone v. United
    Search
  26. Achilli v. United
    Search
  27. See Berra v. United
    Search
  28. See Spies v. United
    Search
  29. See Stevenson v. United
    Search
  30. Lawn v. United
    Search
  31. See United States v. Beacon
    Search
  32. Cf. Achilli v. United
    Search
  33. See Sparf v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial