Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Hanna Vs. Plumer

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 26, 1965

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

62 entries 3 linked 59 unlinked
Show
  1. Palmer Vs. Hoffman US Supreme Court · Feb 01, 1943
  2. Swift Vs. Tyson US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1842
  3. Schlagenhauf Vs. Holder US Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1964
  4. U.S. 460 (1965) U.S. Supreme Court Hanna v. Plumer
    Search
  5. U.S. 460 (1965) Hanna v. Plumer
    Search
  6. Procedure making it clear that in-hand service is not required in diversity actions, it is doubtful that Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins
    Search
  7. test of Guaranty Trust Co. v. York
    Search
  8. On October 17, 1963, the District Court granted respondent's motion for summary judgment, citing Ragan v. Merchants
    Search
  9. Transfer & Warehouse Co., 337 U. S. 530 , and Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. York
    Search
  10. Cf. Insurance Co. v. Bangs
    Search
  11. Sibbach v. Wilson
    Search
  12. In Mississippi Pub. Corp. v. Murphree
    Search
  13. to rules of practice and procedure, have been brought before a court authorized to determine their rights. Sibbach v. Wilson
    Search
  14. were there no conflicting state procedure, Rule 4(d)(1) would clearly control. National Equipment Rental, Limited v. Szukhent
    Search
  15. Court's attention another line of cases, a line which -- like the Federal Rules -- had its birth in 1938. Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins
    Search
  16. cases following Erie diverged markedly from the line construing the Enabling Act. Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. York
    Search
  17. analysis was never Page 380 U. S. 467 intended to serve as a talisman. Byrd v. Blue
    Search
  18. criterion, but rather by reference to the policies underlying the Erie rule. Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. York
    Search
  19. in order to prevent apprehended discrimination in state courts against those not citizens of the state. Swift v. Tyson
    Search
  20. Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins
    Search
  21. which had grown up in response to the rule of Swift v. Tyson
    Search
  22. the incorrect assumption that the rule of Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins
    Search
  23. negligence is a question of local law which federal courts in diversity of citizenship cases ( Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins
    Search
  24. Federal Rules in light of Page 380 U. S. 471 the distinction set forth in Sibbach. E.g., Schlagenhauf v. Holder
    Search
  25. Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. York
    Search
  26. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Wright
    Search
  27. for federal courts even though some of those rules will inevitably differ from comparable state rules. Cf. Herron v. Southern
    Search
  28. Cohen v. Beneficial
    Search
  29. the character and result of the federal litigation stray from the course it would follow in state courts, Sibbach v. Wilson
    Search
  30. This part of the statute, the purpose of which is to speed the settlement of estates, Spaulding v. McConnell
    Search
  31. Doyle v. Moylan
    Search
  32. propriety of which is in dispute -- was made on February 8, 1963.) 331 F.2d at 159. Cf. Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. York
    Search
  33. Ragan v. Merchants
    Search
  34. is involved here, is, as the court below noted, to insure that executors will receive actual notice of claims. Parker v. Rich
    Search
  35. Schlagenhauf v. Holder
    Search
  36. Ragan v. Merchants
    Search
  37. Woods v. Interstate
    Search
  38. Bernhardt v. Polygraphic
    Search
  39. Byrd v. Blue
    Search
  40. See Iovino v. Waterson
    Search
  41. F.2d 41, 46-47 (C.A.2d Cir.1959), cert. denied sub nom. Carlin v. Iovino
    Search
  42. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor
    Search
  43. Cf. Black & White Taxicab Co. v. Brown
    Search
  44. See Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. York
    Search
  45. at 337 U. S. 538 . Similarly, a federal court's refusal to enforce the New Jersey rule involved in Cohen v. Beneficial
    Search
  46. Cf. Monarch Insurance Co. of Ohio v. Spach
    Search
  47. To the same effect, see Ragan v. Merchants
    Search
  48. U.S. Supreme Court Hanna v. Plumer
    Search
  49. of Guaranty Trust Co. v. York
    Search
  50. and Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. York
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial