Citation network
Fpc Vs. Union Electric Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 03, 1965
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
FPC v. UnionSearch
-
Electric Co. - 381 U.S. 90 (1965) U.S. Supreme Court FPC v. UnionSearch
-
Electric Co., 381 U.S. 90 (1965) Federal Power Commission v. UnionSearch
-
transmission of electric energy is fully subject to the commerce powers of Congress. Public Utilities Comm'n v. AttleboroSearch
-
Electric Bond & Share Co. v. SecuritiesSearch
-
of the commerce power quite without regard to the federal control of tributary streams and navigation. See Labor Board v. JonesSearch
-
Labor Board v. FruehaufSearch
-
Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. LaborSearch
-
U. S. 294 , 379 U. S. 301 -304. But see United States v. AppalachianSearch
-
Polish National Alliance v. LaborSearch
-
supervisory power to preserve or improve downstream navigability or water commerce generally. See United States v. RioSearch
-
Phillips v. GuySearch
-
prohibiting the erection of any obstruction to navigation, including those on nonnavigable feeders, United States v. RioSearch
-
First Iowa Hydro-Electric Coop. v. FederalSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
United States v. AppalachianSearch
-
the production of goods destined for interstate shipment was far less defined and understood at that time, see Hammer v. DagenhartSearch
-
Utah Power & Light Co. v. PfostSearch
-
in interstate commerce. This, of course, does not control the commerce powers of Congress. Cf. Consolidated Edison Co. v. LaborSearch
-
Polish Alliance v. LaborSearch
-
is not novel. A Court of Appeals expressly dealt with and rejected this construction of the Act in 1939, United States v. AppalachianSearch
-
jurisdictional limitation or a consistently held administrative interpretation. See American Trucking Assns. v. UnitedSearch
-
provision both before and after its reenactment is an important factor in construing the statute. See, e.g., Helvering v. ReynoldsSearch
-
Commissioner v. EstateSearch
-
the jurisdiction of Congress over such streams was upheld in the case of the United States v. RioSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court FPC v. UnionSearch
-
Federal Power Commission v. UnionSearch
-
of Congress. Public Utilities Comm'n v. AttleboroSearch
-
See Labor Board v. JonesSearch
-
See United States v. RioSearch
-
United States v. RioSearch
-
of Congress. Cf. Consolidated Edison Co. v. LaborSearch
-
See American Trucking Assns. v. UnitedSearch
-
Helvering v. ReynoldsSearch
-
of the United States v. RioSearch
-
Katzenbach v. McClungSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial