Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Atlantic Refining Vs. Ftc

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 01, 1965

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

50 entries 1 linked 49 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Chicago US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1849
  2. U.S. 357 (1965) U.S. Supreme Court Atlantic Refining v. FTC
    Search
  3. U.S. 357 (1965) Atlantic Refining v. Federal
    Search
  4. and especially in light of the holding of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Texaco, Inc. v. Federal
    Search
  5. no limit to business ingenuity and legal gymnastics, the Congress displayed much foresight. See Federal Trade Comm'n v. Cement
    Search
  6. Labor Board v. Hearst
    Search
  7. Federal Trade Comm'n v. Cement
    Search
  8. and short-term provisions. Only last Term, we described the power implications of such arrangements in Simpson v. Union
    Search
  9. of gasoline and oil to its wholesalers and dealers. This was an additional source of economic leverage, United States v. Loew's
    Search
  10. Act. Fashion Originators' Guild v. Federal
    Search
  11. many unfair methods of competition that do not assume the proportions of antitrust violations. Federal Trade Comm'n v. Motion
    Search
  12. brands other than Goodyear. This restraint is, in this respect, broader than the one found in International Salt Co. v. United
    Search
  13. think it enough that the Commission found that a not insubstantial portion of commerce is affected. See United States v. Loew's
    Search
  14. International Salt Co. v. United
    Search
  15. an opportunity to offset these evils by a showing of economic benefit to themselves. Northern Pacific R. Co. v. United
    Search
  16. Jacob Siegel Co. v. Federal
    Search
  17. the limits of its authority when it bars repetitions of similar conduct with other parties. Federal Trade Comm'n v. Henry
    Search
  18. will interfere only where there is no reasonable relation between the remedy and the violation. Federal Trade Comm'n v. Ruberoid
    Search
  19. Together with No. 296, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Federal
    Search
  20. for its broad orders with sufficient clarity and completeness so that they can be properly reviewed. Cf. United States v. Chicago
    Search
  21. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor
    Search
  22. Burlington Truck Lines v. United
    Search
  23. Labor Board v. Metropolitan
    Search
  24. TBA plans as a remedy necessary to cure these coercive practices and prevent their recurrence. See United States v. Loew's
    Search
  25. Securities & Exchange Comm'n v. Chenery
    Search
  26. Corp., 332 U. S. 194 , 332 U. S. 196 . See Labor Board v. Metropolitan
    Search
  27. and the B. F. Goodrich Company without analysis of the relationship between Texaco and its dealers. See Texaco, Inc. v. FTC
    Search
  28. Ins. Co., supra, at 380 U. S. 443 . See Burlington Truck Lines v. United
    Search
  29. Labor Board v. Erie
    Search
  30. U. S. 390 neither been clearly articulated nor supported with adequate economic analysis. In White Motor Co. v. United
    Search
  31. U. S. 391 either rulemaking or the process of case-by-case adjudication. See Securities & Exchange Comm'n v. Chenery
    Search
  32. California v. Lo-Vaca
    Search
  33. U.S. Supreme Court Atlantic Refining v. FTC
    Search
  34. Atlantic Refining v. Federal
    Search
  35. Texaco, Inc. v. Federal
    Search
  36. See Federal Trade Comm'n v. Cement
    Search
  37. Simpson v. Union
    Search
  38. United States v. Loew's
    Search
  39. Federal Trade Comm'n v. Motion
    Search
  40. See United States v. Loew's
    Search
  41. Northern Pacific R. Co. v. United
    Search
  42. Federal Trade Comm'n v. Henry
    Search
  43. Federal Trade Comm'n v. Ruberoid
    Search
  44. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Federal
    Search
  45. Cf. United States v. Chicago
    Search
  46. See Labor Board v. Metropolitan
    Search
  47. See Texaco, Inc. v. FTC
    Search
  48. See Burlington Truck Lines v. United
    Search
  49. In White Motor Co. v. United
    Search
  50. See Securities & Exchange Comm'n v. Chenery
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial