Citation network
Cameron Vs. Johnson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 07, 1965
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 741 (1965) U.S. Supreme Court Cameron v. JohnsonSearch
-
U.S. 741 (1965) Cameron v. JohnsonSearch
-
granted. The judgment, 244 F.Supp. 846, is vacated, and the cause remanded for reconsideration in light of Dombrowski v. PfisterSearch
-
with an unbroken line of this Court's cases going back to the early days of this country. See, e.g., Douglas v. CitySearch
-
Beal v. MissouriSearch
-
Spielman Motor Sales Co. v. DodgeSearch
-
held that federal courts should refrain from interfering with enforcement of state criminal laws. Thus, in Douglas v. CitySearch
-
even though the statute involved was the same day declared unconstitutional in a similar application. Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
not even undertake to forbid or regulate picketing or demonstrating on the streets (as I think it could -- see Cox v. LouisianaSearch
-
Labor Board v. FruitSearch
-
of its generally unquestioned constitutional power to regulate picketing and street activities. See, e.g., Cox v. LouisianaSearch
-
the power of States to regulate conduct on the streets and in public buildings, this Court said in Schneider v. StateSearch
-
recently held that Mississippi must not deny the constitutional right of Negroes to register and vote. United States v. MississippiSearch
-
See Bell v. MarylandSearch
-
Hamm v. CitySearch
-
Appeals stayed the remand orders, and an appeal from those orders is now pending before the Fifth Circuit. Hartfield v. MississippiSearch
-
Anderson v. MississippiSearch
-
Carmichael v. CitySearch
-
Application of Wyckoff, 196 F.Supp. 515, discussed in Brown v. RayfieldSearch
-
See Case v. NebraskaSearch
-
MR. JUSTICE WHITE, dissenting. I dissent from the per curiam remand of this case on the authority of Dombrowski v. PfisterSearch
-
the rule that the possible invalidity of a state statute is not itself ground for equitable relief, Terrace v. ThompsonSearch
-
under such a statute, since no person is immune from prosecution in good faith for alleged criminal acts, Douglas v. CitySearch
-
relaxation of the abstention doctrine where sweeping and unclear statutes are attacked on their face, as in Baggett v. BullittSearch
-
raise no issues of vagueness or overbreadth such as were considered to be present in Baggett v. BullittSearch
-
The statute does not deal with belief or expression as such -- it does not ban all forms of picketing, Thornhill v. AlabamaSearch
-
buildings and the sidewalks and streets contiguous thereto, assuredly permissible subjects of state regulation. Cox v. LouisianaSearch
-
and does not leave one to guess at where fanciful possibility ends and intended coverage begins. Cf. Baggett v. BullittSearch
-
U. S. 479 , 380 U. S. 484 -485. In Douglas v. CitySearch
-
S. 163 . The constitutional challenge to this Mississippi statute, unlike the attack on the statutes in Dombrowski v. PfisterSearch
-
and Baggett v. BullittSearch
-
but indistinguishable from that in Douglas v. CitySearch
-
of a statute, or the imminence of a prosecution under it, itself will not suffice to warrant intervention. Terrace v. ThompsonSearch
-
Douglas v. CitySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Cameron v. JohnsonSearch
-
of Dombrowski v. PfisterSearch
-
Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
United States v. MississippiSearch
-
the Fifth Circuit. Hartfield v. MississippiSearch
-
Brown v. RayfieldSearch
-
Terrace v. ThompsonSearch
-
Cf. Baggett v. BullittSearch
-
In Douglas v. CitySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial