Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United Mine Workers Vs. Pennington

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 07, 1965

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

73 entries 3 linked 70 unlinked
Show
  1. Lawlor Vs. Loewe US Supreme Court · Jan 05, 1915
  2. Apex Hosiery Co. Vs. Leader US Supreme Court · May 27, 1940
  3. United States Vs. Reading US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1855
  4. U.S. 657 (1965) U.S. Supreme Court United Mine Workers v. Pennington
    Search
  5. U.S. 657 (1965) United Mine Workers of America v. Pennington
    Search
  6. public officials do not violate the antitrust laws even though intended to eliminate competition. Eastern R. Conf. v. Noerr
    Search
  7. a union, acting alone, to engage in the conduct therein specified without violating the Sherman Act. United States v. Hutcheson
    Search
  8. United States v. International
    Search
  9. United States v. American
    Search
  10. U.S. at 312 U. S. 232 . (Emphasis added.) And in Allen Bradley Co. v. Union
    Search
  11. Id. at 325 U. S. 809 . See also United Brotherhood of Carpenters v. United
    Search
  12. United States v. Employing
    Search
  13. found expression in a collective bargaining agreement, United Brotherhood Page 381 U. S. 663 of Carpenters v. United
    Search
  14. Teamsters Union v. Oliver
    Search
  15. Louis Dairy Co., 260 F.2d 46 (C.A.8th Cir. 1958), or on hours of work, Philadelphia Record Co. v. Manufacturing
    Search
  16. under the antitrust laws by the United States or by some party injured by the arrangement. Cf. Allen Bradley Co. v. Union
    Search
  17. United States v. Borden
    Search
  18. Lumber Prods. Assn. v. United
    Search
  19. States, 144 F.2d 546, 548 (C.A.9th Cir. 1944), aff'd on this issue sub nom. Brotherhood of Carpenters v. United
    Search
  20. Las Vegas Merchant Plumbers Assn. v. United
    Search
  21. IBEW v. United
    Search
  22. employers and a union, but agreements between the union and employers in a multiemployer bargaining unit. Labor Board v. Truck
    Search
  23. bargaining unit, which is not the kind of restraint Congress intended the Sherman Act to proscribe. Apex Hosiery Co. v. Leader
    Search
  24. Fibreboard Paper Prods. Corp. v. Labor
    Search
  25. of wages, and because they must bargain does not mean that the agreement reached may disregard other laws. Teamsters v. Oliver
    Search
  26. Carpenters v. United
    Search
  27. of such union activity may be to eliminate competition based on differences in such standards. Apex Hosiery Co. v. Leader
    Search
  28. Labor Board v. George
    Search
  29. Press v. United
    Search
  30. Fashion Originators' Guild v. Federal
    Search
  31. Anderson v. Shipowners
    Search
  32. denied its motion for a new trial based on claimed errors in the admission of evidence. In Eastern R. Conf. v. Noerr
    Search
  33. American Banana Co. v. United
    Search
  34. Angle v. Chicago
    Search
  35. Okefenokee Rural Elec. Mem. Corp. v. Florida
    Search
  36. it tends reasonably to show the purpose and character of the particular transactions under scrutiny. Standard Oil Co. v. United
    Search
  37. States, 221 U. S. 1 , 221 U. S. 46 , 221 U. S. 47 . United States v. Reading
    Search
  38. Federal Trade Comm'n v. Cement
    Search
  39. Heike v. United
    Search
  40. American Medical Assn. v. United
    Search
  41. By contrast, in Continental Ore Co. v. Union
    Search
  42. CLARK agree, concurring. As we read the opinion of the Court, it reaffirms the principles of Allen Bradley Co. v. Union
    Search
  43. In Allen Bradley Co. v. Union
    Search
  44. U.S. at 325 U. S. 800 . I repeat what we said in Allen Bradley Co. v. Union
    Search
  45. its philosophy of the free enterprise system as expressed in the antitrust laws and as enforced by Allen Bradley Co. v. Union
    Search
  46. may be, and often is, formed without simultaneous action or agreement on the part of the conspirators. United States v. Schenck
    Search
  47. Levey v. United
    Search
  48. commerce, is sufficient to establish an unlawful conspiracy under the Sherman Act. Eastern States Lumber Assn. v. United
    Search
  49. American Column & Lumber Co. v. United
    Search
  50. Interstate Circuit v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial