Citation network
Wmca, Inc. Vs. Lomenzo
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Oct 11, 1965
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 4 (1965) U.S. Supreme Court WMCA, Inc. v. LomenzoSearch
-
U.S. 4 (1965) WMCA, Inc. v. LomenzoSearch
-
it retains jurisdiction of a fifth, Lomenzo v. WMCASearch
-
which raises substantial questions similar to some of those involved in a set of Hawaii reapportionment cases. Burns v. RichardsonSearch
-
Cravalho v. RichardsonSearch
-
and Abe v. RichardsonSearch
-
The need for clarification is particularly desirable because, through dismissal of the appeal in Rockefeller v. OransSearch
-
No. 319, and affirmance in WMCA, Inc. v. LomenzoSearch
-
In WMCA, Inc. v. LomenzoSearch
-
In now dismissing for lack of a substantial federal question the appeal from that decision ( Rockefeller v. OransSearch
-
of the disposition because of factors to which I advert below. The Court affirms as well two appeals, Travia v. LomenzoSearch
-
No. 191, and Screvane v. LomenzoSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
On June 1, 1965, this Court denied a motion to stay the order and to accelerate the appeal, Travia v. LomenzoSearch
-
the further application for such a stay that was Page 382 U. S. 8 made to me during the summer. Travia v. LomenzoSearch
-
This opinion applies also to Travia et al. v. LomenzoSearch
-
Secretary of State of New York, et al, No. 319, Rockefeller, Governor of New York, et al. v. OransSearch
-
et al., and No. 449, Screvane, President of City Council of City of New York, et al. v. LomenzoSearch
-
The District Court, in the same opinion that found Plan A constitutional, WMCA, Inc. v. LomenzoSearch
-
also held that Plans B, C, and D did not meet the requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment, as interpreted in Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
U. S. 533 , and WMCA, Inc. v. LomenzoSearch
-
U. S. 633 . This Court is retaining jurisdiction in the appeal from those determinations, Lomenzo v. WMCASearch
-
D.C.S.D.N.Y., 246 F.Supp. 953. The order of the District Court was affirmed summarily by this Court, Hughes v. WMCASearch
-
of the New York Constitution was not an integral part of the apportionment scheme invalidated in WMCA, Inc. v. LomenzoSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court WMCA, Inc. v. LomenzoSearch
-
Lomenzo v. WMCASearch
-
and Screvane v. LomenzoSearch
-
and WMCA, Inc. v. LomenzoSearch
-
Court, Hughes v. WMCASearch
-
Travia v. LomenzoSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial