Citation network
Humphrey Vs. Moore
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 06, 1964
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 335 (1964) U.S. Supreme Court Humphrey v. MooreSearch
-
U.S. 335 (1964) Humphrey v. MooreSearch
-
contract is accompanied by a responsibility of equal scope, the responsibility and duty of fair representation. Syres v. OilSearch
-
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. HowardSearch
-
Tunstall v. BrotherhoodSearch
-
Steele v. LouisvilleSearch
-
Wallace Corp. v. LaborSearch
-
and is Page 375 U. S. 344 a case controlled by federal law, Textile Workers Union v. LincolnSearch
-
Mills, 353 U. S. 448 , even though brought in the state court. Local 174, Teamsters v. LucasSearch
-
Smith v. EveningSearch
-
s discharge would violate the contract, and was therefore within the cognizance of federal and state courts, Smith v. EveningSearch
-
whom it represents nor in supporting the position of one group of employees against that of another. In Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSearch
-
under the agreement, is final and binding upon the parties, just as the contract says it is. General Drivers Union v. RissSearch
-
Together with No. 18, General Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local Union No. 89, v. MooreSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Labor Board v. LocalSearch
-
Labor Board v. MirandaSearch
-
ruled otherwise, and the union appears to have abandoned the view here, since it says, relying upon Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSearch
-
We note that, in Syres v. OilSearch
-
courts that the employees should have brought their proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board. Cf. Cosmark v. StruthersSearch
-
contracts between an employer and a labor organization may be brought in either state or federal courts. Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySearch
-
Kent v. CivilSearch
-
Keller v. TeamstersSearch
-
Pratt v. WilsonSearch
-
Walker v. Pennsylvania-ReadingSearch
-
Co. and American Communications Association (Decisions of War Labor Board 1944) 14 L.R.R.M. 1623. Cf. Colbert v. BrotherhoodSearch
-
Labor Board v. WhelandSearch
-
Hardcastle v. WesternSearch
-
Fagan v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Page 375 U. S. 352 et seq. See Syres v. OilSearch
-
N. R. Co., 323 U. S. 192 . Cf. International Association of Machinists v. CentralSearch
-
as the Page 375 U. S. 353 Court said in United Steelworkers of America v. WarriorSearch
-
words of the contract the exclusive source of rights and duties. These principles were applied in Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSearch
-
United Steelworkers of America v. WarriorSearch
-
contract, but implied from the union's rights and responsibilities conferred by federal labor statutes. See Syres v. OilSearch
-
N. R. Co., supra (Railway Labor Act). Cf. International Association of Machinists v. CentralSearch
-
Airlines, Inc., supra (Railway Labor Act). There is nothing to the contrary in Smith v. EveningSearch
-
out of obeisance to what the union deemed to be the requirements of Association of Westinghouse Salaried Employees v. WestinghouseSearch
-
of fair representation may be extended to the employer under appropriate circumstances. This was recognized in Steele v. LouisvilleSearch
-
E.g., United Steelworkers of America v. AmericanSearch
-
United Steelworkers of America v. EnterpriseSearch
-
Does such a federal cause of action come within the play of the preemption doctrine, San Diego Bldg. Trades Council v. GarmonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Humphrey v. MooreSearch
-
Syres v. OilSearch
-
Textile Workers Union v. LincolnSearch
-
Teamsters v. LucasSearch
-
In Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSearch
-
General Drivers Union v. RissSearch
-
Labor Board v. LocalSearch
-
Labor Board v. MirandaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial